Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people.
Stating that scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people, there is a responsibility for scientist to give advantages to general people's life. In some sense, it is true. In my point, however, considering that the possibility that many great scientific achievement come from researches which many contemporary people disregard and many basic researches which were not beneficial at that time are used as very beneficial resources.
Of course, no one can disagree that final purpose of science is making people's life more comfortable and more abundant. Considering the fact that fund for researches generally come from the government's budget which are composed of people's tax, it is sure that researches have to make achievement which can pervade in people's routine life, in that, can provide big comfort. For example, in biological science field, many governments have invested large amount of budget in medicine or researches which are related to curing cancers. AS a result, many biologist have developed new medicine or known about cancer.
However, can we say all scientist focus on only researches which can give large benefit at the present time? My answer is definitely no. In history of science, we can see many cases which looks like small or first and give good things later. For example, in medical field, a doctor claimed that doctors should clean their hands before they start operation. Many doctors laughed at his claim at that time. However, few decades later, existence of germ was known and cleaning doctors' hands had become basic process of operations and it can save many patients' life
Moreover, considering that knowing basic knowledge about our world can give other people chance to make other researches that can give economical benefit. For example, taxonomical researches look like not useful. However, if a good chemical is discovered in a species and the species is very rare and difficult to raise, people would think close species would have the good chemical. But, if we don’t know related species because of shortage of taxonomical knowledge, we have to raise the species with high cost or even we cannot use the good chemical.
To summarize, many people would think that researches have to be rated with their present possibility. However, considering that there have been many historical examples which show that disregarded researches can help many people and many instances which indicates that basic study of our world is very important, it would not right to force for scientist to focus on practical researches. Only foolish people would agree with the thought that world of science works with only beneficial researches.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 546, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun biologist seems to be countable; consider using: 'many biologists'.
Suggestion: many biologists
...related to curing cancers. AS a result, many biologist have developed new medicine or known ab...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 562, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tions and it can save many patients life Moreover, considering that knowing basic...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, moreover, so, for example, of course, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 27.0 11.3162921348 239% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2316.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 443.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22799097065 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66093329785 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48532731377 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 731.7 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.38483146067 274% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.4587101221 60.3974514979 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.894736842 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3157894737 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84210526316 5.21951772744 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264664454242 0.243740707755 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0914497262574 0.0831039109588 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.157412907773 0.0758088955206 208% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171785632157 0.150359130593 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142186398661 0.0667264976115 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.