Mass media and the internet have caused people’s attention spans to get shorter. However, the overall effect has been positive: while people are less able to focus on one thing, they more than make up for it with an enhanced ability to sort through large quantities of information and find what’s important.
The overall effect of mass media and the internet on the public has been positive. Though it has lessened the people's attention span on particular information but increased their ability to prioritize the information. I strongly agree with this for the following reasons.
To begin with, the content present on the internet and mass media is increasing day by day, thereby providing the user to gain more and more knowledge on various subject backgrounds. As time is constrained in contrast with the amount of information present, it is making people increase their ability to filter out the important information that is required. For example, let us assume a student preparing for an interview related to the computer science field. When he tries to browse the internet to gather some information pertaining to his field, it is known that he will get the information from various sources. As a result, he might be not able to give equal time to refer to all the sources but he develops an ability to distinguish the information based on its importance to him. Thus he will be able to get all the necessary information to prepare well for his interview thereby cracking the interview successfully. So, it can be stated that even though mass media and the internet might have made people's attention less, it improved the ability of an individual to distinguish the important content over others.
Further, this ability also helps people to get a bird's eye view of all the topics and then can dive into a particular topic that is much needed to him or her. For instance, a professor in a college is expected to have knowledge about all the concepts corresponding to the subject he teaches. Considering the fact that there is humongous information about any topic on the internet, it is not viable for anyone to acquire total knowledge about the entire topic. But, as the content is very huge on the internet, he develops the ability to have a bird's eye view on most of the topics and then deep-diving into a particular topic that is needed to teach his or her students. Thus the mass content on information on the internet helps people to get more information on a particular topic along with having an idea about all the related areas.
However, some might argue that attention to a particular topic is more important than the ability to distinguish important data. But, practically this does not make any sense as a person with only a grip on a single topic cannot reach a high position in his or her life. Hence the mass media and internet affect the public that it increases his or her ability to sort the large chunk of information even though it might make the attention span get shorter is a positive notion for the public to develop in his or her life
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...en positive. Though it has lessened the peoples attention span on particular informatio...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e with this for the following reasons. To begin with, the content present on th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 800, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...rmation based on its importance to him. Thus he will be able to get all the necessar...
^^^^
Line 2, column 940, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cracking the interview successfully. So, it can be stated that even though mass m...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ish the important content over others. Further, this ability also helps people ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...much needed to him or her. For instance, a professor in a college is expected to ...
^^
Line 3, column 682, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...is needed to teach his or her students. Thus the mass content on information on the ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g an idea about all the related areas. However, some might argue that attention...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 278, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ach a high position in his or her life. Hence the mass media and internet affect the ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, then, thus, well, for example, for instance, in contrast, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2282.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 482.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73443983402 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69763480084 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 215.323595506 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.42531120332 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 738.9 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7717117479 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.777777778 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7777777778 23.4991977007 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61111111111 5.21951772744 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285262450361 0.243740707755 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101147303996 0.0831039109588 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626592521787 0.0758088955206 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197603886894 0.150359130593 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464355038866 0.0667264976115 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.