The claim of people's attention spans getting shorter as a consequence of mass media and internet isn't unfounded. Cults trending worldwide based on a few news articles are commonplace in this age. As more and more information is available digitally, accessibility to these pieces of ideas is quite high, and thus, populace at large can be swayed away without much hinderance. However, more information does not imply more understanding, for gaining insight takes a deeper level knowledge, instead of a shall broad-faced approach, which is the way-to-go in the new age.
Widespread use of whatsapp messaging has led to seamless dissemination of information pertaining to personal, general, entertainment and other genres. Consider the usual notification one gets on this platform: on an average, I tend to receive a large amount of sensational news which is either unfounded, or apocryphal. What this cult ensures through broadcasting these lurid news and messages is entertainment; taking cognizance of a plethora of quotidian events round the nation and the world, but not the real understanding or the historical, cultural or political implications. Thereby, though, the internet can serve broad ideas quickly to a greater audience, it does not necessarily create more informed individuals, merely more aware citizens.]
In addition to the dubious information that one comes across the internet, the cases of web advertisement is an equally interesting topic to consider. Again the commonality from the former example, is the flamboyant, eye-catching captions and the background to arrest the person's attention. The average bloke being aroused by such appeals, is tricked into the sales the company is making through the website, which in many cases isn't as economical on paper as it is displayed on the ad, but nevertheless, the customer is defeated by the cunning. What this displays is that not only that people on large get distracted fancy claims, but more importantly, that their facile knowledge can get them into all sorts of trouble.
Although, it might be wise to see the limitations of electronic information received though the mass media, to nullify their benefits would be a bit conservative. Having silicon embedded five inch devices in pockets, one can get a variety of news, information which affect us in our daily life. For example, suppose that a house in the locality was robbed. Although, the media would be making far-fetched fanciful claims about the same, we might not know the real reason for the incident. But, to know about the implications of a police enquiry, and that the road in that street is bblocked, we can take alternate rooute to our offices, in which case, the mass media information was helpful to us.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
... consequence of mass media and internet isnt unfounded. Cults trending worldwide bas...
^^^^
Line 1, column 148, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'few news'.
Suggestion: few news
...nded. Cults trending worldwide based on a few news articles are commonplace in this age. A...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 751, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '[' seems to be missing
...individuals, merely more aware citizens.] In addition to the dubious informati...
^
Line 5, column 273, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ptions and the background to arrest the persons attention. The average bloke being arou...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 430, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...hrough the website, which in many cases isnt as economical on paper as it is display...
^^^^
Line 5, column 488, Rule ID: BUT_NEVERTHELESS[1]
Message: Use simply 'but'.
Suggestion: but
... on paper as it is displayed on the ad, but nevertheless, the customer is defeated by the cunnin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nevertheless, so, thus, for example, in addition, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2310.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 442.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22624434389 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02197069366 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 215.323595506 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585972850679 0.4932671777 119% => OK
syllable_count: 724.5 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.2973666678 60.3974514979 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.375 118.986275619 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.625 23.4991977007 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0625 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178299616566 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576005552359 0.0831039109588 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653911146306 0.0758088955206 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106301744664 0.150359130593 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03584798284 0.0667264976115 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.38706741573 116% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 100.480337079 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.