Mass media and the internet have caused people’s attention spans to get shorter. However, the overall effect has been positive: while people are less able to focus on one thing, they more than makeup for it with an enhanced ability to sort through large quantities of information and find what’s important.
I don't remember the last time I was not sifting through multiple links in order to complete my assignment. Veritably, one can claim that we all have been there searching through google for content, well because of numerous reasons, firstly it's efficient and we are able to gain knowledge about anything in that is the reason, today there are more people in the world who are "Jack of all, Master of none". We have become so used to the idea of going through compendium that we really don't have a specific prowess, which is required to comment warranted on a topic.
The emergence of new theories and inventions were celebrating heyday during the 1900s, partly because people used to go through a tone of books for the purpose of gaining knowledge which enabled them to draw more astute deductions which further led to an evolution in terms of various fields in sciences, economics, politics. The volume of research in 20th century is although surging and has genuine potential, that potential may never be reached if people base solely on facts and papers from the internet. Further the quality of research has severely depleted, a lot of papers on computer science today share the same breakthroughs and there is a lack of inguenity, partly because of so many lacking journals but still, more than redundancy novel information is required. Hence, for achieving novelty researchers have to deeply study quality content which cannot be achieved through current practices as it reduces our attention span.
People using the internet always are in quandary about multitasking a.k.a sifting through multiple link or focus on finding the perfect link with most of the relevant information. With the time people, today, spend on their work or research, they have to employ the multi-tasking approach, during which they toil, making sure that have covered each and every important aspect of a topic but still a majority of works are found lacking in terms of authenticity and due to lack of attention.
Although there may be certain situations and probably internet is a boon is providing us with an abundance of information, we need to change the way we research on internet trading of multi-tasking and attention to a particular document in a tantamount manner.
Hence, a reduction in the attention span has brought more harm than good to society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-19 | Adesina Boluwatito | 58 | view |
| 2022-11-03 | haemanth10 | 66 | view |
| 2022-10-05 | asm01 | 58 | view |
| 2022-09-30 | anil paltya | view | |
| 2022-07-09 | sally_tt | 66 | view |
- A recent study indicates that children living in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal have lower levels of tooth decay than children living in suburban areas in the United States despite the fact that people in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal rec 52
- As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious. 50
- Claim We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own Reason Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning 79
- Governments should invest as much in the arts as they do in the military 83
- The best way to teach — whether as an educator, employer, or parent — is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 3, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
I dont remember the last time I was not siftin...
^^^^
Line 1, column 368, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...oday there are more people in the world who are 'Jack of all, Master of none'...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 495, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...going through compendium that we really dont have a specific prowess, which is requi...
^^^^
Line 7, column 238, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a tantamount manner" with adverb for "tantamount"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... and attention to a particular document in a tantamount manner. Hence, a reduction in the attent...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 262, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...icular document in a tantamount manner. Hence, a reduction in the attention span...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, really, so, still, then, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.6327345309 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.9520958084 39% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 11.1786427146 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 28.8173652695 76% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 55.5748502994 113% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 16.3942115768 91% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1973.0 2260.96107784 87% => OK
No of words: 392.0 441.139720559 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03316326531 5.12650576532 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.56307096286 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72973845687 2.78398813304 98% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 204.123752495 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576530612245 0.468620217663 123% => OK
syllable_count: 610.2 705.55239521 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 19.7664670659 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.8473053892 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.6387721276 57.8364921388 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 179.363636364 119.503703932 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.6363636364 23.324526521 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.70786347227 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215098515702 0.218282227539 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0787316441213 0.0743258471296 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0341638163432 0.0701772020484 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115465224404 0.128457276422 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0185263652986 0.0628817314937 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.1 14.3799401198 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.95 48.3550499002 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.9 12.197005988 139% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.49 12.5979740519 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.32208582834 117% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 98.500998004 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 12.3882235529 137% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 11.1389221557 144% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.9071856287 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.