Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
It is true that inherent physical differences exist between men and women. For instance, men generally have a more muscular body and bone density which enables them to do the tasks involving heavy weights more easily than women. If this is not enough, women have to go through a period of menstruation on monthly basis where they generally suffer intense body pain. There is also a nine month long maternity period, during which women are supposed to rest only for they are carrying a baby inside their womb. Keeping all this in mind, it is quite evident that nature favours men more for tasks which are physically intensive. But does it make women unsuitable for these tasks?
It is a very rare scenario that anyone would be born perfect. People become close to perfection through their intense hardwork and dedication. For instance, Mary Kom, a world renouned Indian boxer has won numerous tournaments, even after giving birth to children. This depicts that determination and hardwork is all that is required to acheive something which is a part of character and not somatic. Dangal, a bollywood movie depicts how two Indian women, Geeta Phogat and Babita Kumari become the world class wrestlers. These women are known to have fought with men and won also in many national tournaments.Yet another instance from the history, in 18th century India, a woman named Rani Laxmi Bai was an adept warrior who fought and lead some of the great wars. Her bravery and adroitness are still praised in the history books throughout the world.
Going further on this, there are also people who are natually disabled or becomes disabled after an accident but that does not stop them from acheiving what they want. We have numerous personalities in sports who fought their disability and have acheived great success. These instances show us that it is not really impossible to acheive something if someone really set his/her mind on something, even though that person is not naturally equipped to do so.
Hence, the inherent somatic differences do not mean that men and women are not equally suited for the tasks. The world should give equal oppurtunities to both men and women, and let people determine what they want to do. Not every women would like to undergo intense hardwork that is required to make them as physically able as men, but that does not mean they should not be given a chance too.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 610, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Yet
...d won also in many national tournaments.Yet another instance from the history, in 1...
^^^
Line 3, column 742, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...as an adept warrior who fought and lead some of the great wars. Her bravery and adroitness ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 46, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... further on this, there are also people who are natually disabled or becomes disabled a...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, really, so, still, for instance, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1985.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 407.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87714987715 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44806235927 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55773955774 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8730634484 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.473684211 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4210526316 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42105263158 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203491459775 0.243740707755 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689023088167 0.0831039109588 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630601615935 0.0758088955206 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121216325109 0.150359130593 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0807153207409 0.0667264976115 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.