Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The prompt claims that Men and Women are not equally eligible to do many activities owing to the difference in their physical attributes. I do not strongly agree with the writer and would want to argue the same in the points below.
To begin, It is a known fact that Men and Women have variations pertaining to Physical Body. These variations sometimes allow both these genders to take up different jobs. For example, the arduous task of giving birth to a child is naturally bestowed on a woman. We cannot expect a man to do the same. On the other hand, it is impossible for a lady to give birth to an offspring without her man lending his hand to her. It is his job to produce a sperm which later gets transformed into a baby in the mother's womb. Expecting a lady to do this task is merely a stupidity. Therefore, what the author claims is completely suitable when such natural tasks are concerned.
But, when we say 'tasks', they are not just limited to natural ones. There are other tasks as well which are bound to be done by humans. By humans, I mean both the genders equally. Asserting that as a man is stronger than a woman, in terms of the physical body, so the tasks which require innate strength should be assigned to this particular sex doesn't account to be fair. If the great athlete cum boxer Marie Kom's kith and kin had the same vision and perspective regarding the strength and capability of male and female, the world especially India wouldn't have got such an aspiring, talented boxer. Likewise, cooking as it 'seems' to be a relatively easy task, if was limited only to the females and if only women were allowed into the kitchen, some of the great chefs of the country like Mr. Sanjeev Kapoor wouldn't have emerged.
The world is changing at a high pace with both women and men competing with each other in almost all the fields. There is no ranking among them and this been proved by many individuals in the past years. So Claiming that the physical difference both the genders have would stop them from doing a certain field job is not a great assertion. So the author's claim can be limited to natural tasks rather than man-made tasks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 502, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'mothers'' or 'mother's'?
Suggestion: mothers'; mother's
...ter gets transformed into a baby in the mothers womb. Expecting a lady to do this task ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 346, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ould be assigned to this particular sex doesnt account to be fair. If the great athlet...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 549, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
... and female, the world especially India wouldnt have got such an aspiring, talented box...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 744, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ly women were allowed into the kitchen, some of the great chefs of the country like Mr. San...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 807, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
... of the country like Mr. Sanjeev Kapoor wouldnt have emerged. The world is changing ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, likewise, regarding, so, therefore, well, for example, i mean, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1770.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 392.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.51530612245 5.05705443957 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38074586082 2.79657885939 85% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551020408163 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.7033205785 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206376700132 0.243740707755 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590063793856 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545234420141 0.0758088955206 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135492385688 0.150359130593 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365086572867 0.0667264976115 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 14.1392134831 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 48.8420337079 141% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 12.1743820225 68% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 12.1639044944 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.