Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.
The claim discusses the well-known controverisal argument of equality of the genders, given their differing physical capabilities. It is a widely discussed debate with proponents of both sides, although I disagree with the claim since the opposing argument is .
Firstly, physical prowess of humans depend on a plethora of factors. Understanding the impact of these factors on men and women separately is crucial for the claim to be universally valid. To illustrate, a man who has never picked a dumbbell in his life will obviously be less capable of doing physically demanding tasks than a trained woman MMA fighter. Reversing the genders in this example, will obviously lead to the conclusion that the man is better equipped physically. Hence, we can conclude that gender is not a valid argument to compare two different individuals. The amount of physical activities a person is exposed to in his or her lifetime has a major larger influence on determining the person's suitability to perform physically demanding tasks.
Furthermore, social stigmas and cultural, historical patriarchy led to widely prevalent beliefs that women were inherently less abled than women. In older regimes, and even today in some military branches of the world, women were not allowed to join the ranks of soldiers, due to the belief that women are weaker than men. Incidentally, in those old times as well, strong women have broken the social barriers and demonstrated their physical abilities. From queens like Rani Laxmibai who fought hundreds of soldiers single-handedly, to the Vietnamese band of women who were shoulder-to-shoulder with the men to save their people in the war with America, women have proved that when the hour demands, there is no point in subjecting them to such unacceptable comparisons with men.
Lastly, one of the major arguments provided to support the mentioned claim is that the physiology of women is very different to those of men, and hence they are weaker. Since women have to undergo childbirth, the proponents of the claim believe that women's bodies are rendered weak, making them incapable of performing labourious tasks with the same rigour as those of men. In my opinion, this argument needs to be evaluated thoroughly based on scientific studies to be more cogent. Taking for instance, celebrity mothersl like Megan F. who jump back to their physically demanding careers as soon as they are done with the task of labour, with not a hint of health problems.
In conclusion, the claim is unsubstantiated and needs to be evaluated thoroughly based on other factors such as environment, society and health in order to be considered valid. As per the reasons mentioned above, I believe that the claim is flawed and does not hold true in a variety of situations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 260, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...the claim since the opposing argument is . Firstly, physical prowess of humans...
^^
Line 3, column 702, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...jor larger influence on determining the persons suitability to perform physically deman...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., with not a hint of health problems. In conclusion, the claim is unsubstantia...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, incidentally, lastly, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2338.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 455.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13846153846 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96192624471 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542857142857 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 732.6 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.931995201 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.052631579 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9473684211 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47368421053 5.21951772744 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228515709108 0.243740707755 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645523553706 0.0831039109588 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510141055978 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108234019725 0.150359130593 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0655544127254 0.0667264976115 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 100.480337079 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.