Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.
It is true that men and women have disparities in the body structures, mental emotions(females are known for strong emotional gender) and muscular strengths. Due to these differences sometimes the society may consider some works more suitable practically to a particular type. But it will be wrong just to classify the work according to the gender of an individual. Though there are many works which a particular gender may have ease to work but it can never be classifies as specifically for that gender.
Men are usually considered as brawn and muscular. They are stereotyped for the works which may involve physical strengths, power, stamina and endurance. Like many famous sports in many countries like cricket, wrestling, boxing etc had been reserved for men for a longer eon. But many examples in the world of sports had proved this prejudice as fallible. Strong women like Mary Kom (Indian boxer), Babita Phogat (Indian wrestler ,gold winner in commonwealth games) proved many people wrong after winning several medals and applauds for her country in world competitions.
On the other hand, women are always classed for the works involving the emotional works due to their strong emotional feelings. They are considered for the works like home making, child caring, artistic works(Painting or writing) as they are considered for a strong emotional context. But this is also not a justified view. Because it's the choice of women and men what they wanna do or achieve. Earlier many countries have their politics reserved majorly by the men. But the history always changes and the change in country like India was brought up by a strong and firm first lady prime minister mrs. Indira Gandhi. She was an exemplar for many woman around the world that it's just the will that women and men should have and then they can achieve anything and prove many wrong.
But in many cases physical diffrences hinder a particular gender to do a particular work. So to achieve efficiency in that work people use the choices which may suit most aptly for them. Like for example during a construction site where heavy weights and works requires a mandatory strength and stamina male are always preferred. They can carry a large load relatively to female group thus saving hours of work and completing job on time.
Concluding on the total analysis of the issue and the reasons it can be deduced that though there are physical diffrences in the body but it solely depends on the person's will. He/She can achieve anything despite the society expectations from them. It just need a motivation. And there are several examples which is enough for a motivation for a person to do a job. But sometimes priorities are different then just work(it may subsume lucid profit or time constraint or efficiency) and to achieve these people choose a specific gender
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 452, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually put between 'be' and 'classifies'.
Suggestion: be never classifies
...gender may have ease to work but it can never be classifies as specifically for that gender. Me...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ifies as specifically for that gender. Men are usually considered as brawn and ...
^^^
Line 3, column 426, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ian boxer, Babita Phogat Indian wrestler ,gold winner in commonwealth games proved...
^^
Line 5, column 331, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...s is also not a justified view. Because its the choice of women and men what they w...
^^^
Line 5, column 767, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun wrong seems to be countable; consider using: 'many wrongs'.
Suggestion: many wrongs
...hen they can achieve anything and prove many wrong. But in many cases physical diffrenc...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 406, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
... But sometimes priorities are different then just workit may subsume lucid profit or...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, then, thus, for example, in many cases, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 29.0 14.8657303371 195% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2363.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 476.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96428571429 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59703550719 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495798319328 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 742.5 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.8461074697 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.52 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.04 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233722010547 0.243740707755 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647436791597 0.0831039109588 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591414679064 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130544266315 0.150359130593 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645318463147 0.0667264976115 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.