"The most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently committed
to particular principles and objectives. Any leader who is quickly and easily influenced by shifts
in popular opinion will accomplish little."
Leadership is one of the most sought after personality traits in modern world. Be it in job or academic interviews, the test of leadership is one such criteria almost all the candidates in all cases are judged against. This limns the importance leadership has in our society and professional aspects of our life. The adherence to certain established principles and objectives does play a significant role in the efficacy of the leadership one evinces. My views align with the claim for three salient reasons.
Everyone looks upto a leader for directions and guidance. If the leader is wavering between or is subject to vacillation because of precarious shifts in the popular opinion, it confounds the team of people looking upto the leader. For example if a leader of hunting tribe is vacillating between the choices hunt he thinks they should pursue, it leaves the hunting party even more perplexed as to what to look out for. Instead they might end up losing up on the hunting options as a whole because of the precious time ans resources that were lost meanwhile. Had the leader had a predetermined hunt in mind for the day they could've gathered more food and saved time and resources to go for the other ones after. This analogy helps to show that such indecision and lack of firmness can lead to losses on the part of the team and the team as a whole might lose out on great chances of success.
The credibility of the leader becomes questionable, if the leader is influenced easily by popular opinions. For example if the team members find that their leader is susceptible to variations in popular opinion it may be discouraging for the team to trust the leader with a definite view and vision for team's success. The leader's susceptibility to popular opinion may result him into condoning rival opinions that might bifurcate his team, as he or she lacks his own definite set of principles and objectives and fails to make them incumbent upon the team.
The team members will take an advantage of the infirmity of this leadership to necessitate their individual views and opinions. This will result to tumult and contempt within the team and ultimately lead to the team falling apart. In a team there always are discordant elements and they are glued together along with the others by the principles and objectives of the team that are core to the team's success. The leader is the one who does the metaphorical binding of the team members by these principles and objectives.
In sum, a leader's inconsistencies in being aligned with the principles and objectives of a team is deleterious for the team and will lead to ineluctable breakup. Thus the above reasons delineate the problems that might arise due to the inconsistencies and why and one should mostly adhere to a set of premediated principles to ensure success and accomplishment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 418, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
...e perplexed as to what to look out for. Instead they might end up losing up on the hunt...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 322, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
... view and vision for teams success. The leaders susceptibility to popular opinion may r...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 395, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teams'' or 'team's'?
Suggestion: teams'; team's
...ctives of the team that are core to the teams success. The leader is the one who does...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 162, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...m and will lead to ineluctable breakup. Thus the above reasons delineate the problem...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, may, so, thus, while, as to, for example, in all cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2360.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 487.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84599589322 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69766713281 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82219649172 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480492813142 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 744.3 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9861970355 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.35 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 5.21951772744 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192640833444 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697675227602 0.0831039109588 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687230266739 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113004879216 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560421777299 0.0667264976115 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.