Tradition and modernization are incompatible. One must choose between them.
We have often been abreast of reports and news stories that highlight a clash between traditions and modernization and which makes us ponder upon the topic that whether the two are incompatible. In my opinion they are were always destined to be incompatible and also there are other explanations to it which I would discuss in the following 2 paragraphs.
Firstly, the tradition we vaunt about or are be such a braggadocio about all the time is nothing but an imagined reality that we believe on and that binds large sections of the society together. The different aspects of a tradition, its mores and rituals and etc. as explained in Dr. Yuval Noah Harari in examples in his best seller book, "Sapiens" state that these have no actual existence. There are no real existence traditions and everything it engenders. Traditions are belief systems that helps amass large masses of people together and have been doing since its inception during the cognitive revolution period of our hunter gatherer ancestors. It is rather a tool that helps humans communicate and cooperate in larger groups of more than thousands of individuals.
Secondly, the traditions we fear would be tampered by the onset of modernization are not native to the place itself. Modernizations have always determined what traditions would be for a place for a given time. Traditions changed with time and modernization. For example the Indian people first started using spice in their food when several spices and vegetables like tomato first originated in Mexico reached them via ships sailing on newly formed trade routes. It thus established the gastronomical preferences for the Indians. Similar example works for Italy as back in the day Julius Caesar never knew the use of tomato as ketchups and sauces and thus he never had Italian Pasta and Italian classics concomitantly with tomato sauce. No contemporary Italian cuisine and it's connoseuirs will be able to comprehend that.
Lastly, if we resist modernization to play its part in the transmogrification of traditions we fuel ignorance and the ignoramus population increases rapidly. What we see in various traditions around the globe where for example inequality between men and women have been concomitant, resist modernization resulting in immoral practices and rituals still being prevalent. With modernization the equality of genders has been one of the prime changes that the traditions were supposed to catch up. The long established patriarchal societies resist these changes are indolent to them. This has resulted in a significant number of violence and atrocities against women which could have been curbed, had the people not held dearly onto their traditions and purported perpetual beliefs.
One might argue that, traditions help shape a person and helps people comprehend the world with guidance. To that I say, why not let those people grow their comprehensive abilities based on nature and why not let him chose his own belief system or reasoning and rationality? In sum, there is no option to choose between tradition and modernization as the they cannot be juxtaposed and compared. One cannot help but let their tradition to metamorphose with time and modernization. Several had resisted, many are lost, many new emerged with modernization and this where we stand today in the contemporary world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 215, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[8]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put between 'are' and 'were'.
Suggestion: are always were
...wo are incompatible. In my opinion they are were always destined to be incompatible and also th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 219, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...re incompatible. In my opinion they are were always destined to be incompatible and ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 46, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...ly, the tradition we vaunt about or are be such a braggadocio about all the time i...
^^
Line 2, column 255, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...s of a tradition, its mores and rituals and etc. as explained in Dr. Yuval Noah Harari i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 351, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'they'?
Suggestion: the; they
... between tradition and modernization as the they cannot be juxtaposed and compared. One ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, still, thus, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 32.0 14.8657303371 215% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2817.0 2235.4752809 126% => OK
No of words: 539.0 442.535393258 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22634508349 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81833721656 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00583498188 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 296.0 215.323595506 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549165120594 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 899.1 704.065955056 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9163392243 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.68 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.56 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249776929229 0.243740707755 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0675914669096 0.0831039109588 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063755916799 0.0758088955206 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133795897582 0.150359130593 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555421018301 0.0667264976115 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 100.480337079 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.