"Anyone can make things bigger and more complex. What requires real effort and courage is
to move in the opposite direction---in other words, to make things as simple as possible."
In the world that's advancing with celerity and vigor, the intricacies and workings of the world goverened by the physical, economical and sociological law are becoming are ever more inscrutable for an average human being. The average human demands a simplicity in these advanced theoretical and practical concepts the world is bounded by so that they can become cognizant of how everything in their surrounding works. Concocting things of "Bigger" and "Complex" nature is an comparatively easy job than dumbing the these inscrutable ideas down, elicits real endeavours and the braveness bolstering it. To make things simpler is a challenge that a bold and enduring person would take, going against the convention, and it will be a coup to bestowed with panegyric. I strongly with the above assertion for the following two reasons.
The understanding of average population is not high and to be updated with this fast pacing world one must understand the fundamentals of the multifarious aspects of their life that they rely on. This is at this juncture a person who should be commended, if he or she would transmogrify the esoteric and hard to understand complex and bigger fundamentals and temper them to be fed to the general population. For example there are emerging online content creators and online shows that shows luminary and erudite scholars explaining concepts that seem to be out of our grasp to people belonging to different age groups. The age groups include a people from the preadolescence or children, adoloscent, teenage, and adult groups and try to convey to them concepts with varying asperity and make them understand. This type of shows and online content thus targets a wide range of age groups thus making them cognizant of their surroundings and bounding laws of existence. To do that it is one of the noblest but highly enduring jobs to accomplish.
It takes a very detailed understanding of a particular subject matter to tone it down to different levels at the first place. It can be stated as an example that the professors who provide pelucid examples and illustration to their students are able to effectively impart in their students the knowledge but to do that the understanding he should have must be detailed enough so as to relate it to the quotidian occurences of life. Furthermore it takes even more effort to represent that occurence as an illustration or a verbal example to a group of people.
Though one might argue that not all of the inscrutable both tangible and intangible aspects be explained in a lucid way and has its own limitation. After watching a half hour keynote speech by Dr. Brian Green I seem to understand a lot more about string theory and the concept of multiverse that might have seemed daunting otherwise owing to the underlying hard maths. Thus I can definitively snubb such claims and corroborate the alignment of my view that to represent something in more layman's term takes a lot more "effort" and "courage" than making things "bigger" and "complex".
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 14, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
In the world thats advancing with celerity and vigor, the ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 493, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...apos; and 'Complex' nature is an comparatively easy job than dumbing the...
^^
Line 2, column 550, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e scholars explaining concepts that seem to be out of our grasp to people belongi...
^^
Line 3, column 376, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... he should have must be detailed enough so as to relate it to the quotidian occurences o...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 432, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...it to the quotidian occurences of life. Furthermore it takes even more effort to represent ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 33, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...eople. Though one might argue that not all of the inscrutable both tangible and intangibl...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 106, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a lucid way" with adverb for "lucid"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ble and intangible aspects be explained in a lucid way and has its own limitation. After watch...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 369, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ise owing to the underlying hard maths. Thus I can definitively snubb such claims an...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, so, thus, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 31.0 14.8657303371 209% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2581.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 505.0 442.535393258 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11089108911 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74048574033 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24432104715 2.79657885939 116% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 215.323595506 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520792079208 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 813.6 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.0412441613 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.823529412 118.986275619 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.7058823529 23.4991977007 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.35294117647 5.21951772744 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122899776931 0.243740707755 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0336011392958 0.0831039109588 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.03761137548 0.0758088955206 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0725359788693 0.150359130593 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332417309986 0.0667264976115 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 14.1392134831 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 48.8420337079 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.95 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 100.480337079 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.8971910112 134% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.7820224719 153% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.