In most professions and academic fields, imagination is more important than knowledge.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Imagination and knowledge are the two most important things to solve the problems be it in personal or professional life. ‘Imagination’ is a thing which help a person to think in different perspectives rather than same thought process; on the other hand, ‘knowledge’ helps to choose a different path to solve a problem. In my opinion, I mostly agree with the statement that, in certain professions and academic fields, imagination has an edge over knowledge for two reasons.
To begin with, imagination is something that every human being possesses since his/her birth. Imagination could help to change the perspective which would help to solve a problem rather than knowledge. For instance, in terms of, architecture profession having abundant knowledge doesn’t help to design the structures beautiful, but imagination does. It is true that knowledge helps an architect to design the overall structure of the building, but the fastidiousness in that building is only added by good imagination skills. In the above illustrative, it is clear that, good knowledge always helps you to get to a particular stage in your profession, but imagination is the thing which make you a “One of a Kind” in that profession.
Further, even if someone is highly qualified in a particular profession or course, it doesn’t make him/her great unless imagination is not mixed with knowledge. For example, in terms of painting profession, if a painter has enough knowledge of painting, like how to mix colours to form a new colour, how to hold a brush, what stroke of brush where to use but he/she doesn’t possess good imagination skills, then the painting which he/she draws is of no use. The painting drawn with excellent knowledge, only tells the audience about painter’s theoretical knowledge but not the imagination knowledge. With great imagination skills, the painter would be able to add a great story to the painting or some kind of feeling, that has a deep meaning to the painting. Therefore, knowledge is only useful, when one can put it to use and to become great in that particular field, he/she should definitely possess imaginative skills.
Of course, some wide range of people might argue that, with good proper and enough knowledge one can even develop imagination. However, it is not always the case, if one keeps on accumulating knowledge, then she/he might end up losing the imaginative power which is present by birth. Gathering more and more knowledge makes he/she to stick to that knowledge and doesn’t allow them to try in different perspective or approach. Hence, imagination always hold an edge above knowledge
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, kind of, of course, in my opinion, it is true, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2220.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 429.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17482517483 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00439706525 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48951048951 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 677.7 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5945733581 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.588235294 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2352941176 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.94117647059 5.21951772744 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247228583773 0.243740707755 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.087514269381 0.0831039109588 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438334366571 0.0758088955206 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160313735163 0.150359130593 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480377468697 0.0667264976115 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.