In most professions and academic fields, imagination is more important than knowledge.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
I can only agree to the extent with the statement that in most professions and academic fields, imagination is more important than knowledge. Imagination has led to the development of unique works of art and progression in innovation done solely without knowledge or expertise in the field. The professional and academic fields of arts, literature, science, and technology are paradigms of the importance of imagination towards contribution to fields and progression in a world that continues to globalize. However, knowledge is equally crucial to the progression in and enhancement of professions and academic fields.
In the professional and academic world of arts and humanities, imagination has led to innovative oeuvers that shined light on the importance that knowledge was not needed to progress in a field. For instance, Beethoven was a blindly devoted musician who had no expertise or knowledge in the field of music. However, through imagination of what keys on a piano may look like and through efforts in creating unique opus, he was able to distribute musical pieces like no other. His contribution to the field of music showed that knowledge is not necessarily important, since a musician is capable of bringing one’s imagination to life can also lead to success. On the other hand, a writer like Ray Bradbury has shown the importance of imagination in literature. Bradbury used imagination to write books on dystopian societies that triggered readers to critically think about the world around them. Though his books were written decades ago, they are widely read in modern day education. Furthermore, Beethoven and Bradbury show that one is capable of contributing to their field through imagination, in which knowledge is not necessarily the most important part of the creative process.
Likewise, the field of science and technology have emphasized the importance of imagination in creating innovative works. For instance, Eratosthenes imagined what the measurement of the world was. With no prior knowledge to mount his research, he used his own creativity to construct tools to measure the earth by just using footsteps and a few sticks to determine angles and length. While it took effort, his imagination led to the understanding of the measurement of the world, which in turn proved accurate. Aside from science, technological advancement also requires imagination. Steve Jobs is a specimen of using imagination over knowledge. Jobs was not one who created the first computer, however he imagined what it would be like to improve the structure and creation of other devices. This imagination led to the Apple industry, filled with smartphones and devices like no other, which has led to dominate and assist the lives of people. Furthermore, imagination plays a crucial role in the development of knowledge and innovative works, in which knowledge is not the most important part.
While imagination is seen to be the most crucial part in the development of professional and academic fields, it does not necessarily mean knowledge isn’t important. In fact, knowledge plays an equal role. For instance, academic fields such as science and technology require knowledge of scientific methods and tools in order to determine new experiments and conclusions in research. Knowledge on past innovative works also help to enhance future innovation and development in technology. Therefore, knowledge does play an important role since it does provide benefit in the use and understanding of creative works in professions and academic fields.
Furthermore, I do agree with the statement to an extent where imagination has played a more important role in fields and professions. However, knowledge is equally important to the process, and should not be ruled out or seen as entirely inferior, which in most cases is needed to enhance knowledge and understanding.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-16 | jenas | 68 | view |
| 2023-10-27 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-29 | nigarsafarova | 90 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | jayauen | 50 | view |
| 2023-04-28 | graybox | 66 | view |
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants Recently butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States This change however has had little impact 58
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take 83
- Educators should find out what students want included in the curriculum and then offer it to them Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take 66
- In a study of the reading habits of Waymarsh citizens conducted by the University of Waymarsh most respondents said they preferred literary classics as reading material However a second study conducted by the same researchers found that the type of book m 58
- Claim When planning courses educators should take into account the interests and suggestions of their students Reason Students are more motivated to learn when they are interested in what they are studying Write a response in which you discuss the extent 66
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 821, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...her devices. This imagination led to the Apple industry, filled with smartphones ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, likewise, look, may, so, then, therefore, while, for instance, in fact, such as, in most cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 31.0 14.8657303371 209% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 106.0 58.6224719101 181% => OK
Nominalization: 45.0 12.9106741573 349% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3277.0 2235.4752809 147% => OK
No of words: 612.0 442.535393258 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3545751634 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.97379470361 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11096135398 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 215.323595506 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.426470588235 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1049.4 704.065955056 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1993974472 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.035714286 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.60714285714 5.21951772744 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276107127188 0.243740707755 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860572450145 0.0831039109588 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679553208903 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189926940199 0.150359130593 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514582328739 0.0667264976115 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 100.480337079 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 821, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...her devices. This imagination led to the Apple industry, filled with smartphones ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, likewise, look, may, so, then, therefore, while, for instance, in fact, such as, in most cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 31.0 14.8657303371 209% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 106.0 58.6224719101 181% => OK
Nominalization: 45.0 12.9106741573 349% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3277.0 2235.4752809 147% => OK
No of words: 612.0 442.535393258 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3545751634 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.97379470361 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11096135398 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 215.323595506 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.426470588235 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1049.4 704.065955056 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1993974472 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.035714286 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.60714285714 5.21951772744 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276107127188 0.243740707755 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860572450145 0.0831039109588 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679553208903 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189926940199 0.150359130593 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514582328739 0.0667264976115 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 100.480337079 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.