A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Currently, there are very different varieties of countries in the world. Some are very big in sizes but have catholic culture, while there are some countries like India which are small but contain a huge variety of languages and cultures. The author argues that the school curriculum should be the same for all the students of a nation. While I agree with the author's suggestion, there are specific cases where diversifying the curriculum according to regions will be a better solution. Hence, the policy should be implemented according to the nation's demographics.
In India specifically, there exists a variety of languages and cultures. That' why each and every state has its own board of education which tries to align the students according to their local culture and I think that is really good. Everybody should have knowledge about its local culture. For instance, the state of Rajasthan has its own wide history and different culture as compared to other states, now for a student who resides inside Rajasthan, it is essential to have local knowledge. It may be about history, cultural heritages, or about the development of the local language. Local knowledge helps a student to understand his or her culture more closely and this can only be achieved if the school's curriculum is unique and diverse. For instance, if there is only one national curriculum, books cannot be just focussed on the culture of a particular state and will have to align the national values as compare to local values. Hence, diversifying the curriculum can educate students about local knowledge and identifying values more closely.
But diversifying the curriculum has its own problems. In other words, students who have learned different subjects in his or her school education may face difficulties in nationwide exams. For instance, it is possible that a student who studied in a local board of education may have left a few topics like Differentiation-Integration or history of France. Therefore, it is possible that while competing with other students for college, students of a particular state may lag behind. Therefore, it is good to standardize the school curriculum nationwide so that everybody gets a fair chance for higher education. In addition to this, the same national curriculum reduces a lot of difficulties for national examiners too. If they have knowledge about most of the students' school knowledge, it will be easier for them to set the exam instead of working toward generalizing it.
In conclusion, I believe that diversifying curriculum according to the regions is a good idea provided that it does not limit the students from competing for higher education. Because in the end, the role of school education is overall development, and to guide students for future paths do not encumber otherwise.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 361, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...nts of a nation. While I agree with the authors suggestion, there are specific cases wh...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 702, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'schools'' or 'school's'?
Suggestion: schools'; school's
...ly and this can only be achieved if the schools curriculum is unique and diverse. For i...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, really, so, therefore, while, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2362.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 458.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15720524017 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02108302755 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 215.323595506 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.445414847162 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 768.6 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6939909063 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.363636364 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8181818182 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 5.21951772744 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177344860419 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0642751032922 0.0831039109588 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557452504964 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115626735539 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302878451182 0.0667264976115 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.