Each student has distinct talents and interests. Having a uniform national curriculum set by the state for all the students before they enter college will have many harmful results.
Students plan to get a variety of degrees and specialize in varying fields, teaching all of them the same curriculum till they enter college will not prepare them specifically to do good in their field of choice. For example, a student who wants to be go to a fine arts college may not want to study maths and focus more on sketching, however, a student interested in being an engineer would want to have a strong base in maths to do good in college. Thus, designing a single curriculum that would be suitable for both the students is not possible.
Even if an attempt is made to formulate a curriculum that includes basics required for all the future courses that students are likely to study in college, that curriculum would be too vast. Such a curriculum would be too tough for the students to cope with and would overburden students with subjects that they don't want to pursue further in life.
Forcing students to study subjects they are not interested in could make them less enthusiastic about studies. Under a common curriculum students could find themselves trying to master subjects that they have no aptitude in and no enthusiasm for, this can make them demotivated. Forcing a student who is bad in maths to pass a calculus cource can make the student give up on studies alltogether.
Finally, different college cources require students to have different aptitudes and talents to become successful professionals. A doctor may need to have the capacity to study for long hours and to memorise a lot, an engineer would need to be good at maths, a designer would need to have a good sense of colour shades. Making all the students study the same stubjects would not help to refine their inner talents. It would not help to make them good at what they are more intersted in and would not contribute towards making better professionals. In contrast, teaching a student, who is aspiring to be an engineer, maths and science would make him/her more likely to do better in college and to be a better professional.
Thus, it is not feasible to make all students study the same curriculum, as that curriculum would not do justice to the individual interests and aptitudes of different students. It would also be cumbersome for the students and hamper their performance as a professional.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 469, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to do good in college. Thus, designing a single curriculum that would be suitable...
^^
Line 5, column 313, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...burden students with subjects that they dont want to pursue further in life. For...
^^^^
Line 7, column 327, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a student who is bad in maths to pass a calculus cource can make the student giv...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, may, so, thus, for example, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.4196629213 193% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2065.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 425.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85882352941 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72166852956 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.437647058824 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 641.7 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9764215446 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.470588235 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.23529411765 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276041204222 0.243740707755 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108927912749 0.0831039109588 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699309186112 0.0758088955206 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176470470821 0.150359130593 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486423396779 0.0667264976115 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.