A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Education is, without a doubt, one of the most important components of progress. According to the economist Gary Becker, 70 percent of economic development is due to human capital. Consequently, nations should give to their students the best education they can and, in doing so, freedom is key. So, requiring that all students learn the same national curriculum is counterproductive. In my opinion, goverments should not impose or even recommend the same national curriculum for every school. Therefore, I strongly disagree with the recommendation for three reasons.
First of all, all students are different. If governments want that all students learn the same national curriculum, most of them will not be able to get the best of their capabilities. Every human is intelligent but in different fields. If, for example, one students is excellent at maths and other student is excellent at music, the fact that both must study the same curriculum will not be benefical. In this case, at least two different curriculums would be necessary: one which focuses in math and other that focuses in music. In the general case, there would be many fields, each with its corresponding curriculum. So, given the possibility that every school can choose its own educational program will benefit in a better way such different students.
Moreover, it is imposible that the State knows which is the best curriculum for students. Even when the government recongnizes that every student has their own intelligencies, how can the governments know which is the best curriculum of every student in the country? The answer is: they cannot. This is due to the fact that all the information necessary to build such curriculums is spread in the market and many of it has not been created yet. Imagine a goverment in 1980 that prepared a general national curriculum that does not incorporate subjects related to informatics. The evolution of computer in the next decade should have requearied such knowled in the curriculum. Only the market can update such kind of information faster than the State because markey is more efficient.
In addition, when goverments recommend certain curriculum, they usually do that in order to impose their own potical ideas. This is cleary see in a socialist country like Argentina. In this country, the State controls all curriculums, even the private school's curriculums. Students learn things such as that the State is good, that high taxes are good or even that Social Justice is not a crime. The result of this is a society with the wrong ideas of how a good economic should be. And, because of the, the socialism always win in Argentina, increasing poverty every year. Consequently, freedom in eduacation is really important in order to stop the adoctrination in such nations and this can be reach through the elimination of the national curriculum imposed by the State.
In conclusion, of course that some general knowledge is necessary that the student learn: like history, idioms or maths. But, in order to maximize students' capabilities, it will not be convenient to impose through the state a general national curriculum. Every school should have the freedom to choose what the best subject to teach are, in order to clean education form all political influence.
- Educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and su 58
- Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning f 50
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the m 58
- It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero. 54
- True beauty is found not in the exceptional but in the commonplace.Write an essay in which you take a position on the statement above. In developing and supporting your essay, consider instances in which the statement does and does not hold true. 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 421, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve. In my opinion, goverments should not impose or even recommend the same nation...
^^
Line 3, column 255, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one student', 'a student', or simply 'students'?
Suggestion: one student; a student; students
...t in different fields. If, for example, one students is excellent at maths and other student...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 500, Rule ID: THE_PUNCT[1]
Message: Did you forget something after 'the'?
...ood economic should be. And, because of the, the socialism always win in Argentina, ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 777, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tional curriculum imposed by the State. In conclusion, of course that some gener...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, moreover, really, so, therefore, at least, for example, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, of course, such as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.3162921348 186% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2758.0 2235.4752809 123% => OK
No of words: 538.0 442.535393258 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12639405204 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81610080973 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90396920322 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46468401487 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 857.7 704.065955056 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 4.38483146067 319% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.5525471129 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.9333333333 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9333333333 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247551936552 0.243740707755 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0703035339941 0.0831039109588 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060962568427 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152742993232 0.150359130593 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0607751739502 0.0667264976115 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.