A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
The author of the issue asserts that there should be an identical syllabus for whole students before entering the college. This is the claim with which I generally do not concur. Among the countless reasons which give adherence to my viewpoint, I will delve into the most conspicuous ones in the following paragraphs.
The first striking reason which should be considered is the importance of the educational program according to students’ capability. In fact, it is obvious that all individuals do not possess an equal level on intelligence and cognition; therefore, there should be a different learning program according to the varying levels of understanding. A possible outcome of the implementation of a unique schedule to entire students could have different negative outcomes. For instance, the plausible result could be disgust of students with the low level of understanding form the lessons; on the other hand, the program may cover the content below the intelligence stand of the ingenuous student; consequently, the content of the courses will be boring and pale for this group of the students. So, it is important to arrange the program which fits with the students’ intelligence and capability.
Another equal crux point which should be considered is the effect of the specified schedule during the high school for selecting the major in college or university. In fact, while the program is arranged based on the identified talent of the student, the pupil has this opportunity to shape and form a lucid picture from his future job according to his experiences at the high school. For example, during the study at the high school if a student, who is good at the math and calculation, is encouraged to follow a program which covers the mathematics and physics instead of art or biology; the pupil will have this chance to clarify that he is good at engineering rather than medicine or art. During his proliferated and specified study at that period, he also has this opportunity to narrow down his specialty and explicitly pick a job for his future which totally aligns with his talent and recognition.
The last reason which rears my standpoint is the specified background gained during high school is beneficial at the college or university for learning faster and easier. In another word, the high school is a period which students should beside the learning the basic contents, get background about their studies in the college or university. Since the study in the college is based on the teaching the required skill and knowledge for the particular major, some ground for this them during the high school could pave the path for easier and faster learning by the student at the college.
To wrap it up, all aforementioned reasons depicts providing the same program for entire students do not fit their talent, capability, and requirement of their future vocation; in addition, the specified program is more helpful for a student for making the decision about their future job and learning process in the college.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 326, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ob and learning process in the college.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2548.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 501.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08582834331 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73107062784 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85680416454 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.453093812375 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 785.7 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.99550561798 220% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.3752776651 60.3974514979 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.25 118.986275619 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.3125 23.4991977007 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.21951772744 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157727076342 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0629041024158 0.0831039109588 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0338315165198 0.0758088955206 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103529209533 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0227602879614 0.0667264976115 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 14.1392134831 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 48.8420337079 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.