A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Having same national curriculum until students enter college is not ideal.
One of the primary purpose of high school and early education is to ensure students are given ample opportunity to understand their field of interests and work towards gaining specialisation in that domain. Having standard curriculum throught schools will hamper the advances of those students who have found their area of specialisation and want to gain deeper insights into the same. These pedigree of students will not only be deprived of the opportunity to divulge themselves more into their subject of interest, but will also have to comply with curriculum norms, forcing them to study those subjects which have little or no relevance to their interests.
With the advances made by human effort, a vast number of fields have opened up for the young students to chose from. What was considered unorthodox 50 years ago are mainstream today, be it pursuing entrepreunership or learning sound engineering, a multitude of professions have opened up. Confining young students to a standard course work will create a barrier in having an exposure to the new and lesser known fields as it will be very diffcult to design a curriculum so broad to cover majority of the fields. Even if a good course plan is designed in high probability it will only be able to provide a very superficial understanding of the subject. Thus creating "Jack of all trades and master of none".
However it is noteworthy to point out that equiformity in the syllabus overall will ensure that all students have same exposure throughout the nation, thus uplifting the education infrastructure of small towns and villages where the quality of education might have been below par compared to their urban counterparts. This will also help students while applying for the college admissions as they all would have had similar education background and there will be no injustice interms of quality of education.
Although having same curriculum throughout does helps in creating a equiform education system, it does more harm than good because it hinders exposure for various fields and prevents students to develop specialised skills early on in their accademic lives.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 227, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to sound'
Suggestion: to sound
...t pursuing entrepreunership or learning sound engineering, a multitude of professions...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 512, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[2]
Message: “Even if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... broad to cover majority of the fields. Even if a good course plan is designed in high ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...f all trades and master of none'. However it is noteworthy to point out that equi...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 67, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...culum throughout does helps in creating a equiform education system, it does more...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1867.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 359.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20055710306 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84932212495 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562674094708 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.2246963992 60.3974514979 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.583333333 118.986275619 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.9166666667 23.4991977007 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176034015096 0.243740707755 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823571992256 0.0831039109588 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108211404473 0.0758088955206 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151979392509 0.150359130593 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138856537375 0.0667264976115 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 14.1392134831 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 48.8420337079 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.