The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment.
Artforms are judged by their appeal more than the brand name of the artist. A bad art by a good artist in any timeline will be equally criti Hence it is unfair to say that the real talent of a popular musician cannot be accurately assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, thus preventing interferance of his fame with honest judgement.
The final output of any artist has to be met with positive reception of critics and the general audience inorder for it be accepted as an allrounded triumph, and musicians are no different to this phenomena. The music as an outcome has an advantage of faster assessments in comparision to some other artforms like abstract painting ,as the later requires lot of comprehension at the end of audience's and sometimes intricate knowledge of that artform. Music on the other hand can be assessed by novice, and the popularity is a result of the general audience liking to the music irrespective of the brand name that created the music. Existing popularity of a famed musician might be helpful in reaching larger audience but if the music is not captivating, it will be equally critisized because larger audience provokes bigger critisism.
Looking at the greats of this artform, be it Mozart or Bethovan, these music legends were equally appreciated and heard during their time as they were celebrated beyond their life. Even today the admmirers of these musicians continue to praise their talent, which goes on to say that a really talented musician will be celebrated as much in their time as they will be beyond their time, because eventhough body perishes the art stays eternal.
However it is important to note here that there are few musicians who's popularity has faded over the time, but this could not be considered as a sign of lack of talent, because such phenomenas happend for a mirade of reasons. It could be equally likely that the music produced by them was not preserved well for the future generations to listen or due to socio-economic situations around the world the work and fame of these musicians was deliberately destroyed.
If we as a generation try to look at the patterns on how we treat artists of previous generations, we could infact conclude that people have an habbit of overglorifying the past and underestimating the present,And if this methodology is to be accepted upon, then the claim of assessing the real talent of musicians after large generation gap might actually skew the results and will not be accurate.
A good work of a musician will always be appreciated during and beyond his time, their might be few exemptions but when looking at the whole picture, the popularity of musician has barely any relevance on the grading of his talent in any time of history.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 193, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...umph, and musicians are no different to this phenomena. The music as an outcome has ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 332, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...me other artforms like abstract painting ,as the later requires lot of comprehensi...
^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ody perishes the art stays eternal. However it is important to note here that there...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 67, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: who's
... note here that there are few musicians whos popularity has faded over the time, but...
^^^^
Line 10, column 142, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... could infact conclude that people have an habbit of overglorifying the past and u...
^^
Line 10, column 210, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , And
...the past and underestimating the present,And if this methodology is to be accepted u...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, hence, however, if, look, really, so, then, thus, well, as to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2308.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 472.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88983050847 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79618319802 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487288135593 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 749.7 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 23.0359550562 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.8295193509 60.3974514979 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 192.333333333 118.986275619 162% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.3333333333 23.4991977007 167% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.91666666667 5.21951772744 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342608941465 0.243740707755 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133615688422 0.0831039109588 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142056630289 0.0758088955206 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197519612652 0.150359130593 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129904517252 0.0667264976115 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.3 14.1392134831 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.89 48.8420337079 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 12.1743820225 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.8971910112 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 11.2143820225 157% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.7820224719 153% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.