A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
School and high school life of the students, is the learning stage where they need to experience the basics of the various subjects which they need to learn in advance when they get admitted to college or university. So, requiring all the students to study the same national curriculum might not be the effective way to enhance the student ability in his growing stage. Therefore, nation requiring all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college might not be viable.
Students when in their growing age if made to learn equal and standard subjects would lead to mould all of the students ability equally and there would be lack of diversity in their learning and imagining things. Whereas, when we consider that students are the growing future of the nation it is necessary that every student should think, imagine and learn differently in order to improve their ability and when they will reach their matured and grown up state they would tend to apply their different and innovative thinkings for improving the nation. Therefore, when students are allowed and guided to choose the subjects according to their interests, the education system would be more productive and the students will have different qualities which will vary from student to student and this would increase the chances of improvement in various field of study in future when they enter the college.
Eventually, when students are made to study the same curricular their would be less interrogation between the students during their academic period, which will lead to decrease in the proper conversation ability among the students. As their would be not much and distinct topics for the students to talk about and the conversation among them will be mostly out of academics and other things. On the other hand, if the students are allowed to take the different curriculum their will be distinct topics to talk about among the students and the exchange of various knowledge from the different students will be the basics of the conversation between them and thus increasing their conversation ability and interrogate properly amongst themselves. Therefore, this would give them a plus point when they enter college as they will be equipped with enhanced abilities to interrogate and learn different things instantly.
In addition, when students made to learn the same curriculum, in future may find it difficult to choose their right career path, as they would be unable to understand their interests due to lack of various abilities which they should have learned in their growing age. In contrast, when students allowed to choose the curriculum according to their interests, would make them more independent and wise when choosing their career path and setting their long-term goals.
Altogether, students should be allowed to choose their curriculum according to their own interests, and if any student unable to find out his own interest should be guided to choose his curriculum instead of requiring all the students to study the same national curriculum until they enter the college.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 53, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to equal'
Suggestion: to equal
...n in their growing age if made to learn equal and standard subjects would lead to mou...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 101, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...d standard subjects would lead to mould all of the students ability equally and there woul...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 112, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...subjects would lead to mould all of the students ability equally and there would be lack...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 304, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'choosing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: choosing
...age. In contrast, when students allowed to choose the curriculum according to their inter...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, therefore, thus, whereas, in addition, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 27.0 12.4196629213 217% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2597.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 505.0 442.535393258 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14257425743 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74048574033 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57650777497 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.374257425743 0.4932671777 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 788.4 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 23.0359550562 165% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.9439238096 60.3974514979 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 199.769230769 118.986275619 168% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.8461538462 23.4991977007 165% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.30769230769 5.21951772744 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348209406003 0.243740707755 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185739288437 0.0831039109588 224% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.185567005985 0.0758088955206 245% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271259715281 0.150359130593 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.167759421982 0.0667264976115 251% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.2 14.1392134831 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.91 48.8420337079 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 12.1743820225 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 11.2143820225 153% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.