A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
When considering the issue of public education, one main problem is this:Are the monolithic curriculum merits? The authors claims that the government should institude nationwide curriculum. However, I largely disagree with the author's contention, and this essay will exhibit reasons and examples why I do not agree with the homogeneous national curriculum.
Admittedly, some people argue that the same national curriculums are more preferable, because nationwide regulation and control of education can guarantee the quality of education. When the nation's education is under control, government should monitor contents of education, while the unregulated education can provide misleading informations. Hypothetically speaking, in the society with no government, there are no criteria or standard for teachers and teachings. Thus this society cannot afford credible education to students. Accrodingly, the government's education contol is partially beneficial because the quality of education can be warranted by nation.
However, in spite of its benefits, the monolithic education also have flaws. For one, the centralized education cannot be fitted for each individual's demands and prospects. It is clear that abilities and preferences in education are divers even in one classroom, so the homogeneous education cannot foster students' potential capacity. For example, in the centralized education, schools cannot provide extensive educations about golfs or pianos, because this kind of national curriculums are obviously unaffordable. Under this monolithic curriculum, exceptional golf athletes or pianists cannot be made. However, when these potential ahtelets and piansts can be teached by decentralized and individual-fitted curriculums, their talents can be adequately addressed. For these reasons, heterogeneous educations have benefits in providing more adaptable educations.
Furthermore, the curriculum that made by the government has potential big ploblems of brainwashing. Because the government can control and adjust its education, it is more easier in centralized education to provide government-friendly education. In many historical examples, such as Nazi Germany, the brainwashing through national education is critical and beneficial for their dictorial power. However, the decentralized education can prevent the problem of brainwashing and provide diverse perspective to students. For these reasons, the same nationwide educatoin have critical pflaw.
To sum up, even though the centralized education have some benefits, the heterogeneous curriculum is more perferable, because there are huge possible and dangerous problems in the monolithic nationwide education.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
When considering the issue of public edu...
^^
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'claim'.
Suggestion: claim
...nolithic curriculum merits? The authors claims that the government should institude na...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 230, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...m. However, I largely disagree with the authors contention, and this essay will exhibit...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h the homogeneous national curriculum. Admittedly, some people argue that the s...
^^
Line 2, column 192, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...ntee the quality of education. When the nations education is under control, government ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 468, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...or standard for teachers and teachings. Thus this society cannot afford credible edu...
^^^^
Line 2, column 549, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...education to students. Accrodingly, the governments education contol is partially beneficia...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... education can be warranted by nation. However, in spite of its benefits, the m...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n providing more adaptable educations. Furthermore, the curriculum that made by...
^^
Line 4, column 169, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...control and adjust its education, it is more easier in centralized education to provide gov...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ionwide educatoin have critical pflaw. To sum up, even though the centralized e...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, so, thus, while, for example, kind of, such as, in spite of, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 29.0 12.9106741573 225% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2315.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 373.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.20643431635 5.05705443957 123% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31065220603 2.79657885939 118% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506702412869 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 749.7 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.59117977528 126% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.1911643213 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.238095238 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7619047619 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128954686748 0.243740707755 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0462452439752 0.0831039109588 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404200123464 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0826838615855 0.150359130593 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357612234888 0.0667264976115 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 14.1392134831 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.38 48.8420337079 42% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.44 12.1639044944 152% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.