A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
The statement at hand suggests that students and a nation as a whole would benefit from requiring all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. Each student comes from a unique background, has a unique personality and talents, meaning that students may require unique academic curriculum. while this might be true, students should be required to study the same basic core national curriculum in language arts, math, social studies and sciences. this is why I mostly disagree with the statement. First off, students learn at different rates and have different interests. having each unique student study the exact same curriculum could have detrimental effects on students who learn at a different rate or are interested in an academic fields other than the ones that are being pushed on them. For example, a student that has mental impediments or learn at a slower rate than their counterparts will have a difficult time following the national curriculum, therefore falling behind on their studies. these students would benefit from having an individualized curriculum that meets their unique academic needs. On the other side, there are students that show natural academic talent and also benefit from an individualized academic plan. if these students are also forced into following the proposed national curriculum, their academic talents will stagnate because they are not being constantly challenged. these examples are solid evidence of how a national curriculum would not benefit the students of a nation. Secondly, even if there is a group of students that learn at the "average" pace, their interest will vary. For example, in this set of students, there might be some that are interested in going to college to pursue a four-year degree, while others aspire to attend trade school to become mechanics or cosmetologists. The recommendation being examined states that the national curriculum should be the same for each student up until college. To increase the chance for each student to succeed, their pre-college academic curriculum should be tailored to their talents and interests. For example, a student that is interested in becoming a mechanic would not benefit from taking science heavy courses compared to engineering and mechanic courses. also, a student that is becoming a doctor has no benefit in taking many history and social science courses. these students would benefit the most if they take courses that align with their interests and will prepare them best for their future plans. On the other hand, the recommendation is advantageous if there is a national curriculum based on categories of study rather than individual courses. examples of these categories include the science, math, English, social studies, and foreign language courses. this approach would let each student be challenged with courses suited best for them while making sure that every student is exposed to the same basic curriculum. Overall, the recommendation means for students to thrive academically, but there are many wholes in the proposal that will make student success less than likely.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 328, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...may require unique academic curriculum. while this might be true, students should be ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 484, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...rts, math, social studies and sciences. this is why I mostly disagree with the state...
^^^^
Line 1, column 609, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Having
...ent rates and have different interests. having each unique student study the exact sam...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1038, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...refore falling behind on their studies. these students would benefit from having an i...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 1275, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...t from an individualized academic plan. if these students are also forced into fol...
^^
Line 1, column 1445, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...ey are not being constantly challenged. these examples are solid evidence of how a na...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 2307, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
...ed to engineering and mechanic courses. also, a student that is becoming a doctor ha...
^^^^
Line 1, column 2374, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun history seems to be countable; consider using: 'many histories'.
Suggestion: many histories
...oming a doctor has no benefit in taking many history and social science courses. these stude...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 2415, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...any history and social science courses. these students would benefit the most if they...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 2706, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Examples
...f study rather than individual courses. examples of these categories include the science...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 2817, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... studies, and foreign language courses. this approach would let each student be chal...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2647.0 2235.4752809 118% => OK
No of words: 496.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33669354839 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71922212354 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79764838139 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.4375 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 837.9 704.065955056 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3861327436 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.318181818 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5454545455 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.40909090909 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.97078651685 20% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375931587704 0.243740707755 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128883124324 0.0831039109588 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.149839061234 0.0758088955206 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.375931587704 0.150359130593 250% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667264976115 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.