A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The topic raises a widely debated issue about students studying a same national curriculum until they enter in college. Indisputably, a common study programme could be highly beneficial to high institutions because we expect that almost every admitted student will have the same skills and knowledge to pursue his/her studies. Nevertheless, an entire nation is a very diverse place, where each states and regions have their own cultures, and consequently their own method of teaching people. Thus, I disagree with the fact that the same curriculum should mandatory to all students before they enter college.
First of all, there are numerous types of different schools with completely different methods of learning based on the desire and goals of its students. Technical schools are one of the best examples to illustrate this. Its curriculum is totally focused on teaching young about courses that are relevant to the technician profession, such as an electrician or a welder. Also, this method proved that is very efficient and people coming from this institutions are very skilled and prepared workers. As a result, the change to a common curriculum will destroy any different type of school. Consequently, all institutions might be focuses just on preparing young to enter in college and, as exemplified before, is not a common desire.
Secondly, using the same national curriculum could denigrate the culture of a country. For instance, if this method was used in Canada it would be a complete disaster. The country have a strong French enfluence in on part of the nation, where courses such as history and geography are very focused on topics related to French colonization, while the other part will learn about the English people. Creating a common curriculum will surely be very controversial because there is no correct anwser, each place should teach the subjects that are relevant to their area and no one should change that reality.
admittedly, a common syllabus will help a lot college and universities. The faculties will expect that students will have the same expertise and they will be able to easily develop the program that will fit the desires of everyone. However, the argument above does not constitute a sufficient support for the claim that behind academic grades there are people. The most renowned universities around the world have the acknowledgment of being very diverse, with students from all over the country and also a considerable amount of international ones. People from different parts are able to bring small peculiarities that are beneficial to everybody, just adding knowledge to the whole system.
In sum, although the claim that a common curriculum should be benign to the entire nation, they also to tend off in irrelevant directions. As long as students are being well prepared for college there is no reason to change this reality. In fact, the small differences between places is what helps to create a national identity and should stay like that.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 501, Rule ID: AGREE_WITH_THE_FACT[1]
Message: Use simply 'disagree that'.
Suggestion: disagree that
... own method of teaching people. Thus, I disagree with the fact that the same curriculum should mandatory to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 442, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...s very efficient and people coming from this institutions are very skilled and prepa...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Admittedly
...nd no one should change that reality. admittedly, a common syllabus will help a lot coll...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, for instance, in fact, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2518.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 487.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1704312115 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69766713281 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75809388344 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503080082136 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 801.0 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.029408842 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.454545455 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1363636364 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 5.21951772744 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203835722965 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066695052183 0.0831039109588 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774067432345 0.0758088955206 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125739735642 0.150359130593 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.072408923321 0.0667264976115 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 100.480337079 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.