Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness area in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for a economic gain.
The author states that the passing laws by nations can help keep any wilderness area in their natural state even these areas could be developed for economic gain. I agree with the author’s statement as natural well-being is more important than the economic prosperity in today’s polluted environment.
Firstly, those remaining wilderness areas are the home for different species of plants, animals and birds .Even some of them are the endangered species. When the jungle turns into the concrete jungle those species will most probably extinct from the world .Every creatures and species play a vital role in the ecosystem. The loss of any species imbalance this ecocycle which in long run affects entire living creatures .For example : birds/ butterflies help in pollination process to assist germination of new plants in varying places and those birds /butterflies may be in the verge of extinction if these wilderness areas are not preserved.
In addition, in the name of development and economic gain, we could possible deteriorate the environment. Those wilderness areas serve oxygen to the atmosphere where we live inside. For instance: construction of roads, airports and developmental infrastructure in Nijgardh, a rural town in Nepal destroys about 80 lakhs forest. This destruction leads different types of hazards like soil erosion, air pollution along with endangerment of wild habitat.
However, some may argue that those natural areas could be developed by preserving its wilderness. Even some argue that shifting of those species to another safe land would be a possible solution but I think it is wrong approach because shifting of plants’ species is almost impossible. And, what about sky reamers like eagles who only come to their nest at night.
In conclusion, in greed of economic prosperity, we should not destroy the wilderness of natural area. A possible solution to the developmental need of destruction could be carried out far from those areas because it's not ideal deal to put humanity in risk for prosperity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ent species of plants, animals and birds .Even some of them are the endangered spe...
^^
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Even
...t species of plants, animals and birds .Even some of them are the endangered species...
^^^^
Line 3, column 154, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ome of them are the endangered species. When the jungle turns into the concrete jung...
^^^^
Line 3, column 256, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ill most probably extinct from the world .Every creatures and species play a vital...
^^
Line 3, column 258, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Every
...l most probably extinct from the world .Every creatures and species play a vital role...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 419, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...long run affects entire living creatures .For example : birds/ butterflies help in...
^^
Line 3, column 421, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...ng run affects entire living creatures .For example : birds/ butterflies help in po...
^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o put humanity in risk for prosperity.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, well, even so, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1741.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 325.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35692307692 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8978509911 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603076923077 0.4932671777 122% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.0204471962 60.3974514979 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.357142857 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2142857143 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 5.21951772744 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.452860053335 0.243740707755 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153091893308 0.0831039109588 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.182799087818 0.0758088955206 241% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246209948858 0.150359130593 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.152576637667 0.0667264976115 229% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.1392134831 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.