ISSUE WRITING
Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Educational institutions and students are two inter-dependable aspects of societal development. Students are guided at very early age to the professional level at these institutions. Yes, indeed, it is the institution that shapes the students effort to the career goals. But are they have rights to take this privilege to control students ‘desire to pursue subjects or study of their interests? I think no to this question and I disagree with the author’s statement that educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
At first, dissuading students from pursuing fields of study of their interest will result negative impact on fresh brain of the students. At this very early stage of learning and flourishing, these steps drawn by educational institutions will provide extreme de-motivations among the students who are very energetic and passionate to act as a future pillar of nation. It’s should not be like a military camp to respond for an order, instead, students can utilize their power of wisdom to decide their own fields of studies. How can they rise? How can they shine? , if not given freedom to think, freedom to act and freedom to choice.
Additionally, by considering what standards, they set criteria? Since some students are transfer students and some students are those who have bad academic records due to poor health at certain phase of schooling. Now, the institutions have most probably only a grade sheet to judge them in this condition. So, they should not have right of responsibility to impede students’ choice. For example: Albert Einstein, who used to fail in his childhood days turned into a great scientist of entire human kind. If Einstein was judged by his previous academics and hindered him to pursue education of his choice then world could not have received this intellectual personality.
However, some may argue that then what is the responsibility of educational institutions, only tutoring? I want to state that students should be given advise and counseling by these institutions. They should have the responsibility to counsel students in the phase of career goal but students should be given rights to decide for their career development.
In conclusion, in the name of responsibility, educational institutions should not decide the field of study because it is not guaranteed that they are unlikely to succeed as we can see in the above mentioned example of Einstein. Students’ fresh mind is full of enthusiasm so it’s a bad deal to restrict them as it will act as a de-motivation factor for their overall development .Instead, these institutions should provide proper guidelines to the students .Hence, that educational institutions should not have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 235, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
..., it is the institution that shapes the students effort to the career goals. But are the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 409, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...ts or study of their interests? I think no to this question and I disagree with th...
^^
Line 3, column 569, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... How can they rise? How can they shine? , if not given freedom to think, freedom ...
^
Line 5, column 677, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...received this intellectual personality. However, some may argue that then what i...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 152, Rule ID: GIVE_ADVISE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'advice' (a noun)?
Suggestion: advice
... to state that students should be given advise and counseling by these institutions. T...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 388, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ion factor for their overall development .Instead, these institutions should provi...
^^
Line 8, column 390, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Instead
...n factor for their overall development .Instead, these institutions should provide prop...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 466, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...rovide proper guidelines to the students .Hence, that educational institutions sho...
^^
Line 8, column 468, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Hence
...vide proper guidelines to the students .Hence, that educational institutions should n...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, may, so, then, thus, for example, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2475.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 465.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32258064516 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64369019777 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15874069853 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477419354839 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 765.9 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.5495717011 60.3974514979 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.5 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1363636364 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292594476408 0.243740707755 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0902676939676 0.0831039109588 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108269294419 0.0758088955206 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187338690119 0.150359130593 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10046462496 0.0667264976115 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.