Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permit inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
The argument mentioned by author is about the unwanted condition created by cow flu in certain areas residing human settlement. On developing the argument, the author seems not to be completely in clear state of whether inoculations should be done or not . Rather, he forwards some prevaricating statements and undermines some other possible situations.
Firstly, author is trying to convince us that life of people went due to lack of routine inoculations. Well, it might be true that inoculations has came across to resist flu but the much reliance towards the inoculations without knowing its past progress and side effects , the author should not guarantee about its reliability. May be inoculations side effects may leads towards more dangerous physical conditions .Without stating total facts about it, the author should not directly pass the argument supporting it completely.
Secondly, again the author is confusing some unwarranted facts to hinder needed process of inoculations in his statement. He has not mentioned any sources , statistics about the possibility of death of a person. Those facts may be false and rumored to shadow the lack of effectiveness of local administration to conduct inoculations in affected areas.
Hence, it would be more clear and strong argument if author had cited above mentioned logic in developing his argument. It would be more realistic if the author had provided the proper sources and statistics about the cow flu, infected areas and person to effectively handle the harsh condition created by cow flu in those detected areas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 255, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ether inoculations should be done or not . Rather, he forwards some prevaricating ...
^^
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'come'.
Suggestion: come
... it might be true that inoculations has came across to resist flu but the much relia...
^^^^
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...owing its past progress and side effects , the author should not guarantee about i...
^^
Line 3, column 415, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...wards more dangerous physical conditions .Without stating total facts about it, th...
^^
Line 3, column 417, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Without
...rds more dangerous physical conditions .Without stating total facts about it, the autho...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 155, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...tement. He has not mentioned any sources , statistics about the possibility of dea...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.6327345309 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 13.6137724551 15% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 28.8173652695 56% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 55.5748502994 65% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 16.3942115768 67% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1334.0 2260.96107784 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 249.0 441.139720559 56% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35742971888 5.12650576532 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.56307096286 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96323104418 2.78398813304 106% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 204.123752495 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562248995984 0.468620217663 120% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 705.55239521 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 19.7664670659 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5529113345 57.8364921388 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.272727273 119.503703932 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6363636364 23.324526521 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72727272727 5.70786347227 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152480443714 0.218282227539 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641124957995 0.0743258471296 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0338887314587 0.0701772020484 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0991058086079 0.128457276422 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0122240443566 0.0628817314937 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.3799401198 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.3550499002 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.197005988 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.5979740519 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.32208582834 106% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 98.500998004 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 12.3882235529 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.