Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
The statement states the nations dilemma about the preservation of its wilderness and economic development of the nation. I agree with the statement that there should be a law in place to preserve any remaining wilderness area in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
We are in mist of Global environmental crises; by protecting the wilderness we are helping the reduction of the carbon emission. Also, by protecting the wilderness it helps with retention of the biodiversity of that particular place. Therefore, I strongly agree with the author about having a law in place to preserve any remaining wilderness area in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
In last few years, we saw many examples of developers taking the land cutting down its wilderness and building factories or other industrial complex. Because of this not only the biodiversity of the area is disturbed but along with that carbon emission is increases which adversely affects the environment. Having law in place nation can protect the biodiversity and control the carbon emission. With the raising global temperature protecting such wilderness is very important; by making it in law it would become illegal to destroyed the wilderness in mist of economic development.
Nations should focus on economic development in area at which wilderness would not affect. Nations should pass the law which protects the existing remaining wilderness and along with that guide on how the economic development can take place without harming the wilderness. Many nations are trying to pass the laws which guide on economic development without harming remaining wilderness of the nation. Along with that such nations are making it possible with proper planning and further developing the existing industrial areas.
To sum up, With the increasing global temperature, carbon emission it is duty of the nation to protect remaining wilderness and its diversity therefore I agree with the author to pass necessary law to protect such wilderness even if the area could be developed for economic gain. The nation should find the alternate solution for the economic development without harming environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 30, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
The statement states the nations dilemma about the preservation of its w...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... could be developed for economic gain. We are in mist of Global environmental c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ness in mist of economic development. Nations should focus on economic develop...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...elopment without harming environment.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1906.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 355.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36901408451 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86107616017 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 215.323595506 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.4 0.4932671777 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 597.6 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2273636643 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.066666667 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 5.21951772744 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.566063808244 0.243740707755 232% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.229579872552 0.0831039109588 276% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.218867364473 0.0758088955206 289% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.405984112563 0.150359130593 270% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.198500700954 0.0667264976115 297% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 100.480337079 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.