Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
In today's world where the deforestation and depletment of natural resources is happening at a extreme rate, if nothing is done right now than in few years there won't be any type of natural habitat. Passing laws on preserving any type of wilderness in their natural state would have many advantages. I totally agree with the author on the topic that for economic gain natural habitat should not be harm. It would be very inhuman thing to destroy an area for the growth of humans.
If we destroy a natural habitat of an area than it would be effect all the living organism living in that area, including humans. Let's us understand this by an example. If a river direction is change, so that the water is receive by a factory near by, than by doing this the land near the river would become unfertile and the farmers would be affected. The farmers would have to used more fertilizers to grow there crop and eating the food with chemical fertilizers would be harmful on human health. The plants growing near the river would also be affected. The plants in the river which is the primary source of food for the fish would be destroyed as a result the fishes in the river would die.
If the forest is cut down to make space for industrialization and making new cities than it would have a adverse effect on the environment overall. Forest are like the lungs of the earth. They help in reducing the carbon dioxide from the air and increase oxygen in the air. Forest helps to bring rain in the area which makes the area fertile and the water problems reduces. If we cut down the forest than the wild animals would not have place to live and enough food. They would often come out of the forest in search of food and shelter and harm the life of human. Even if we shift them to a natural reserve there is a high probability that the animal would not be able to adapt to the confine space and would die.
If there is deforestation on the mountains to make roads and for mining the gems and metals which helps in boasts the economic growth, it comes with a problem. Cutting the forest would make the soil lose and landslides increases. There is high need to pass laws by the nation to preserve any type of wilderness area in their natural state, even on cost of economic gain. Human are intelligent organism and they would find ways to make money even without harming the natural habitat. If we destroy the natural habitat than the animals living within in would become extinct. To maintain a natural balance in the environment it is important to save the habitat
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...nt of natural resources is happening at a extreme rate, if nothing is done right ...
^
Line 2, column 223, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'received'.
Suggestion: received
...rection is change, so that the water is receive by a factory near by, than by doing thi...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 244, Rule ID: NEAR_BY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nearby'?
Suggestion: nearby
... that the water is receive by a factory near by, than by doing this the land near the r...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 559, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... near the river would also be affected. The plants in the river which is the primar...
^^^
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...nd making new cities than it would have a adverse effect on the environment overa...
^
Line 4, column 484, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...en without harming the natural habitat. If we destroy the natural habitat than the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2090.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 466.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48497854077 5.05705443957 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64618479453 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33839814356 2.79657885939 84% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.444206008584 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 666.9 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.10617977528 322% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6719114531 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8695652174 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2608695652 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.08695652174 5.21951772744 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260944920019 0.243740707755 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882920675083 0.0831039109588 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126585165606 0.0758088955206 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199582163275 0.150359130593 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120266599197 0.0667264976115 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 14.1392134831 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 48.8420337079 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 12.1639044944 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...nt of natural resources is happening at a extreme rate, if nothing is done right ...
^
Line 2, column 223, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'received'.
Suggestion: received
...rection is change, so that the water is receive by a factory near by, than by doing thi...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 244, Rule ID: NEAR_BY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nearby'?
Suggestion: nearby
... that the water is receive by a factory near by, than by doing this the land near the r...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 559, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... near the river would also be affected. The plants in the river which is the primar...
^^^
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...nd making new cities than it would have a adverse effect on the environment overa...
^
Line 4, column 484, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...en without harming the natural habitat. If we destroy the natural habitat than the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2090.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 466.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48497854077 5.05705443957 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64618479453 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33839814356 2.79657885939 84% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.444206008584 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 666.9 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.10617977528 322% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6719114531 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8695652174 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2608695652 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.08695652174 5.21951772744 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260944920019 0.243740707755 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882920675083 0.0831039109588 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126585165606 0.0758088955206 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199582163275 0.150359130593 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120266599197 0.0667264976115 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 14.1392134831 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 48.8420337079 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 12.1639044944 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.