Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the
position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible
consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your
position.
The statement shapes that wilderness areas should be preserved, despite of the need to these areas for economic gains. This statement is valid, as the economic gain areas could be made in remote unused areas. In addition to the wilderness areas could be used itself to gain money from tourism.
For instance, the wilderness areas could be preserved and advertised to attract tourist to the city. Consequently, the economic level would be bolstered by these wilderness areas. Therefore, the assumption that wilderness areas limiting economical gross is not true. Thus, the statement is valid for both economic and preserving wild life development.
Furthermore, the economic gain areas could be established at areas other than the wilderness preservable areas. Consequently, the two prespectives of areas usage could be paralleled without any limitations upon each other. For example, economical industrial areas could be established at opened unused zones in a counter which is not full of wild life such non-forest zones or desert. New cities also could be established remote from residential cities in order to preserve healthy environment for human kind.
On the other hand, perhaps the use of these wilderness areas for economic proposes would lead to establish better wild life care parks and centres that maybe contribute for better wild animal health and preserve wild animals population based on science and medical care. For example, These natural park places could be done on a defined piece of land allowing an efficient use of wilderness areas and at the same time keep the wildlife safe. It should be noted that this assumption might cost an initial large amont of investigation, however, it’s long term efficiency. Thus, for limited resources counties and to safe the resources for more urgent problems solution, the wilderness areas should be preserved.
Eventually, the previously discussed statement is proven true and valid among the different prespectives.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 218, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...er wild animal health and preserve wild animals population based on science and medical...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 655, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'problems'' or 'problem's'?
Suggestion: problems'; problem's
...d to safe the resources for more urgent problems solution, the wilderness areas should b...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, as for, for example, for instance, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 33.0505617978 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 58.6224719101 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1686.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 310.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43870967742 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83232603343 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 215.323595506 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529032258065 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.3545692866 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.375 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 5.21951772744 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372531421201 0.243740707755 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151790517375 0.0831039109588 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687544558021 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22314294464 0.150359130593 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101100079245 0.0667264976115 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.