Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
The shortage of natural resources is a paramount subject in the modern world. Since the industrial revolution, the planet has been suffering the consequences of a massive eagerness for monetary gains. As far as I am concerned, nations should start to take preservation of wilderness sites for granted, they should create laws and policies to preclude the overexploration of the earth's natural places, as the destruction of those places can be deleterious to the society in many ways.
By circumscribing the possible interactions with the wild enviromnent, governments will probably have to deal with a decrease in the economic gains at first. Companies usually do not see investiments in the preservation of nature as salutary. Instead, they usually wish to explore the milieu in order to produce money from the resources usage. Coversely, they could benefit from a policy of preservation as the debilitation of the environment can affect their production in a long term, especially if their main resources are non-renewable.
Moreover, some economic gains are directly related to the maintainability of natural areas. Let's consider, for instance, the Great Barrier Reef in Australian coast. Its beauty attracts people from all over the world, which contributes to a significant parcel of the region`s incomings. As the interference of industrial activities starts to be ominous to the marine life in the reef, the Australian government has been raising new regulations to hamper the rapid destruction of the area.
From another perspective, the lack of enough pristine areas can affect people's health as well. We are already suffering from the so-called maladies of the modern world like depression, stress and so on. Who can assure that they are not mostly caused by the aggressive depletion of the planet`s resources along the years? It is hard to look for a placid place to take a rest when you are in a megalopolis like New York City, for example, and all you can see are buildings around your head. Sometimes people just need to be reintegrated to natural areas so that they can be recuperated from a disease.
In conclusion, even if a nation needs to aim its economical growth, there has to be a balance between the exploration of the environment and the potential gains that such activity could bring to the society. The depletion of the wilderness areas can not only temper with the sustainability of those earnings, but it can also affect people`s health.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h the wild enviromnent, governments will probably have to deal with a decrease in...
^^
Line 3, column 329, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
...lieu in order to produce money from the resources usage. Coversely, they could benefit f...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 93, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...o the maintainability of natural areas. Lets consider, for instance, the Great Barri...
^^^^
Line 9, column 50, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...sion, even if a nation needs to aim its economical growth, there has to be a balance betwe...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, moreover, so, well, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2089.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 404.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17079207921 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12845730721 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55198019802 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 657.0 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3118566961 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.055555556 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27777777778 5.21951772744 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242154817938 0.243740707755 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645029759132 0.0831039109588 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490829263037 0.0758088955206 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127948976856 0.150359130593 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0283381368383 0.0667264976115 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.