As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Technology is presented everywhere, affecting the way people interact with the environment. From using a smartphone to trace its route towards somewhere to being assisted by a robot in a remote surgery, people are relying more and more in technology. However, the dissemination of such a paragon should not be taken as a threat to human cognition capacity, but as a tool to support its future achievements.
Time consuming tasks, which in the past used to be overwhelming, are now capable of being dealt by means of portable devices, such as smartphones, tablets, laptops and so on. Writing an essay, finding sights to visit in a touristic trip can now be easily and fast achieved by typing or touching few times in a screen. The ability to think was not lost; the task of putting ideas in action which was improved by those technology advents.
Another important contribution of technology to the society is in the field of Artificial Intelligence. Automated driven cars, the usage of intelligent agents to perform complex tasks such as remote assisted surgeries, the usage of machine learning algorithms to help in the identification of criminals in a video are just a couple of examples. Though, even stated as intelligent, those processes require human interaction at some point. Either by providing insightful information to the automation to be done or by developing more sophisticated hardwares and softwares to support that technology.
The amelioration that technology has brought to industrial field is another point to highlight. What before was time and human consuming processes, nowadays can be easily taken care of by automated machines. One more example of the benefit of relying in technology. Again, individuals can use their spared time to engage in more rich cognitive tasks.
As exposed, the outcomes brought by technological advances are capable of dealing with time consuming and not insightful activities which once depended on human interaction to run. Thus, the ubiquity of technology is not deteriorating human cognition but giving people opportunity to concentrate in more important problems and tasks which in turn tend to bolster technological processes, forming a cycle of cooperation but not deterioration of one to the detriment of the other.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, thus, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 33.0505617978 21% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1924.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 364.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28571428571 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14604464504 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541208791209 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 628.2 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.0791145075 60.3974514979 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.25 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.1875 5.21951772744 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211770009691 0.243740707755 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702294577248 0.0831039109588 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594721715067 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121154750601 0.150359130593 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534611077527 0.0667264976115 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.