Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
It is known that, through arts, humanity has been printing its history in this planet along the years. That is an important field that should be given the attention it deserves. People should have access to all forms of arts and they should receive support in order reach such public. For that reason, I believe governments should buttress the development of arts. Conversely, there are some points of attention regarding this matter.
First of all, government funding is important because some artistic representations do not have enough resources to burgeon. It could be difficult to theater groups, for instance, to find private sponsors that could financially support them. This is even more inveterate if the group is formed mostly by tyros or if they are small and possess no famous performer.
Second, arts can be viewed as an investment to an administration. There is no controversy about the fact that governments should devote some money to social programs. And some kind of arts can be addressed as so. A school of dance, for example, can help to take children out of the streets. A teaching project like that can provide activities to those youngers and thereby assist them on getting away from drugs and crimes.
On the other hand, this government assistance should not be noxious to the freedom of expression of the artistic movements. There may be a fear that because a group is being funded, its patron might cesurate its ideas. Accordingly, there must be a way to preclude the government to temper with the subjects dealt by the artistic groups it supports. Even though a performance criticizes the government for its policies or behavior, this liberty to do so ought to be unscathed.
Another point of concern is regarding the over-dependence of such fundings. It could be deleterious to the arts not being able to grow independently of government supporting. Therefore, this help system should be treated as advisable and necessary, but never crucial to the development of the arts.
In conclusion, public financial helping to the arts can be a healthy way of bolstering its flourishment in the society. This, nonetheless, should be treated with caution not to interfere with the independence and freedom of artistic expressions.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, conversely, first, if, may, nonetheless, regarding, second, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1895.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 371.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10781671159 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93005923633 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544474393531 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.6779253585 60.3974514979 41% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.1363636364 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8636363636 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.95454545455 5.21951772744 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267013255814 0.243740707755 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799271706098 0.0831039109588 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680755247019 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137034304118 0.150359130593 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0307032481884 0.0667264976115 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.