Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.
Food and Employment are the basic necessities of life. When the citizens of a country are being deprived of these basic requirements, it is indeed a problem of great magnitude. But before we decide whether or not we should suspend funding for the arts or pull money from any other field, we need to look into various factors.
First, we need to analyze the cause of the unemployment rates or why a majority of the people are going hungry. Often, on analyzing, we notice that it is not the lack of funding that is contributing to this situation but how the steps are being implemented combat these problems. It could be a natural disaster that is contributing to the lack of food, or perhaps it might me the result of the lack of jobs caused due to a global economic depression. The government might have to come up with solutions like importing grains or even encouraging start-up companies with office space ,tax incentives, etc., that will have a long term solution to these problems.
If we do find out that it is the lack of funding that is causing the problem and the government is not having adequate emergency funds to fight this, I believe it would be better for the government to try to reduce the funding from various other department instead of completely suspending funding for arts. That way, one single field will not be solely impacted.
We also need to consider that arts is already a neglected field in many countries. To further deplete its funds, will discourage the budding artists and cause their talent to go unnoticed. The government needs to focus on the immediate needs of the country as well as the cultural and intellectual endeavors of the people.
We also need to remember that many people are already employed in the arts as professors, in art galleries, etc. Cutting off funding for this group will actually be counterproductive to combating unemployment as this might lead to unemployment of many.
So my suggestion would be to properly analyze the causes behind these problems and their solutions before taking drastic measures that might eventually further add to the problem.
- In this age of intensive media coverage, it is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.50
- As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious.50
- Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.70
- When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings54
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long-term, realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition.54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 29, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Food and Employment are the basic necessities of life. When the citizens of a country...
Line 1, column 199, Rule ID: WHETHER
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
...f great magnitude. But before we decide whether or not we should suspend funding for the arts ...
Line 2, column 581, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
...ing start-up companies with office space ,tax incentives, etc., that will have a l...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, look, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1757.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 363.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84022038567 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76624627972 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523415977961 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.6266176258 60.3974514979 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.133333333 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.86666666667 5.21951772744 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180301922998 0.243740707755 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529590502792 0.0831039109588 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05776426743 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0967975625295 0.150359130593 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627739036579 0.0667264976115 94% => OK
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.