Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Countries that are in a situation of severe destitute should not support arts, rather they should implement government-funded programs to help the people in need. Nevertheless, the possibility of arts as a mean to enhance mental health in penurious situations should also be given a second look.
First of all, the government should be responsible that their citizens are provided with the basic rights: that they are provided food and water, have a safe shelter, and are able to wear clothes. It would be wrong to relegate legislators that overlook these basic rights of the people because they should make policies that are favorable to the people of their hometown or nation. For instance, President Lee Sung Man was highly denunciated for his wrong using of government budgets to enhance traditional music: the people wanted food subsidy, not music to show off to other visiting countries.
Next, the government doesn't have any obligation to support these disciplines even in times of frugality. The cherishment of the mind could not be considered as the basic rights of humans, even though the contemporary society underscores the importance of the sound mind. Basic rights should be defined as what we want to accomplish as humans not the means to accomplish it. For instance, it would be wrong to assert that the access to music concerts is a right because it ensures a peaceful state of the mind: the concert would be a means to the mind not the state of the mind itself. Hence, although it is the government's duty to ensure the mental health of the people, the methods used by the individuals should be meet by one's endeavors.
Nonetheless, mental poverty may be more miserable that material poverty: such mental poverty can be cured by art. By listening to music or watching a movie, people will be able to refresh their minds, which might enable them to see the silver lining. A remarkable example is the Federal Arts Project by the US president Roosevelt. Even though the policy raised controversy in the era, in the end it was able to flourish with the conviction of Roosevelt. Consequently, the government should not overlook in funding arts that have a lasting value.
In conclusion, even though funding arts may seem inhumane in penurious situations, the funding of creations with perpetual value should not be overlooked.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 23, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ting countries. Next, the government doesnt have any obligation to support these di...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 613, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
... mind itself. Hence, although it is the governments duty to ensure the mental health of the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, hence, look, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, so, for instance, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1963.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 392.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00765306122 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78675015315 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497448979592 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7606868655 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.6875 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8125 5.21951772744 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148569787369 0.243740707755 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543989774937 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395435104568 0.0758088955206 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0944603282651 0.150359130593 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295688868624 0.0667264976115 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.