Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.
A government is wholly and solely responsible for the people living in the nation and nation's development. So, basically, the government is responsible to bring development in the people and for the people. Thus, they should have a major percentage of focus on whether the people's need is fulfilled or not. If people are facing the problem of unemployment or hunger then the government should come forward and help them out to create a better nation without keeping in mind any other things like funding for arts, international relations, etc.
If people are not facing the problem of hunger or unemployment the nation as a whole will improvise day by day. The number of internationally known personalities will increase. Thus, creating their footprints on their path to success. So, if the problem of hunger and unemployment is tackled satisfactorily, then it would create more of the arts that government could fund in near future. This can be considered as a win-win situation
over a period of time.
Now secondly, if the problem of hunger and unemployment is not tackled in a proper way then it will eventually degrade the nation’s economy as well as financial condition. Moreover, if the government still funds for the arts, then it will put the government into lots of pressure to handle both the situations of financial crisis and the problem of hunger and unemployment.
As stated above if there is a decrease in the development of the nation, then the nation won't create internationally know personalities and overall there won't be left any of the arts to preserve that they wanted to fund. Instead, if the government right now solved the problem of hunger and unemployment then there are much more chances of funding the arts in near future.
Let us consider that government does not think about the statistics of the number of hungry and unemployed people in the nation
Therefore, a government should look at all the statistics and keep a check whether their people are not hampered by any means and then only invest their time and money in other areas of concern.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 435, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...can be considered as a win-win situation over a period of time. Now secondly, ...
^^^
Line 4, column 8, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...sidered as a win-win situation over a period of time. Now secondly, if the problem of hun...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 72, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper way" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... hunger and unemployment is not tackled in a proper way then it will eventually degrade the nat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 128, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ngry and unemployed people in the nation Therefore, a government should look at a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, thus, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1747.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 352.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96306818182 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9259419066 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 215.323595506 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.463068181818 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 532.8 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.4476600145 60.3974514979 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.785714286 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1428571429 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27015499151 0.243740707755 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.098342464371 0.0831039109588 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561236854677 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12873465137 0.150359130593 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0607311723273 0.0667264976115 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 100.480337079 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.