Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant number of their citizens are hungry or unemployed
A government is wholly and solely responsible for the people living in the nation and nation's development. So, basically, the government is responsible to bring development in the people and for the people. Thus, they should have a major percentage of focus on whether the people's need is fulfilled or not. If people are facing the problem of unemployment or hunger then the government should come forward and help them out to create a better nation without keeping in mind any other things like funding for arts, international relations, etc.
If people are not facing the problem of hunger or unemployment the nation as a whole will improvise day by day. The number of internationally known personalities will increase. Thus, creating their footprints on their path to success. So, if the problem of hunger and unemployment is tackled satisfactorily, then it would create more of the arts that government could fund in near future. This can be considered as a win-win situation over a period of time.
Now secondly, if the problem of hunger and unemployment is not tackled in a proper way then it will eventually degrade the nation’s economy as well as financial condition. Moreover, if the government still funds for the arts, then it will put the government into lots of pressure to handle both the situations of financial crisis and the problem of hunger and unemployment.
As stated above if there is a decrease in the development of the nation, then nation won't create internationally know personalities and overall there won't be left any of the arts to preserve that they wanted to fund. Instead, if the government right now solved the problem of hunger and unemployment then there is much more chance of funding the arts in near future.
Let us consider that government does not think about the statistics of a number of hungry and unemployed people in the nation
Therefore, a government should look at all the statistics and keep a check whether their people are not hampered in any means and then only invest their time and money in other areas of concern.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 443, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...onsidered as a win-win situation over a period of time. Now secondly, if the problem of hunge...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 72, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper way" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... hunger and unemployment is not tackled in a proper way then it will eventually degrade the nat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 126, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ngry and unemployed people in the nation Therefore, a government should look at a...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, thus, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1728.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 351.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92307692308 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93476058668 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 215.323595506 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.464387464387 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 531.0 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.6395315863 60.3974514979 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.428571429 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0714285714 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325311290311 0.243740707755 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114703856199 0.0831039109588 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605301444037 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178650766743 0.150359130593 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421306643435 0.0667264976115 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 100.480337079 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.