Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Nowadays, there is a different view of the issue about whether the government should still fund for the arts when people in the country are hungry or unemployed. Depending on personal experiences and beliefs, we may find that some people think art still has necessary to be supported, while others hold different attitude that they assert that help people not stay in hungry and to be employed are the most important to a nation, thus it should not spend extra fund on other fields when people are struggling. As far as I concerned, I believe the art is necessary to exist at any time and is still needed to be funded. The following discussion will explore my view.
Indeed, everything that man understands has meaning because of the existence of human life. Thus, the needings with foods, clothes, the place to live, and works are the foundation for all other things. Besides, survival is the most critical thing for any creature, and if people cannot survive in the world, the other thing is useless for them.
On the other hand, can people not be spirited? The function of art is precisely to let people know themselves spiritually. Many and many things are dismissing in histories such as technologies, skills, and knowledge, but culture and art persist. Such facts can point out how vital art is and why so many turmoils in history that many people are without food to eat are still allowing art to be passed down from generation to generation. Moreover, how a government should arrange its revenue and public resource depends entirely on the government's order of priorities. Whether a government should fund art is nothing to do with the financial strength. Therefore, there is nothing with whether it is feasible or not.
In fact, funding and non-funding both have their advantages and disadvantages that any government always has its own consideration, and none of the decision, funding or not, is the best choice. Depending on the different situation, people may have different tendencies. If people have to choose between the flesh and the soul, the material and the spirit, some human being may choose the soul but others are not, and this difference is common saw in the world.
In conclusion, despite the material life is essential to human, there are still many other factors we should consider discreetly, Therefore, we cannot presumptuously believe the statement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 569, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...on the governments order of priorities. Whether a government should fund art is nothing...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1992.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 400.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73886837946 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.5596099611 60.3974514979 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.666666667 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.21951772744 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148980596049 0.243740707755 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513763006343 0.0831039109588 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555325487753 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0757740179444 0.150359130593 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454137303804 0.0667264976115 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.8971910112 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.