People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making.
Nowadays, there is a different view of the issue about people's behavior. Depending on personal experiences and beliefs, we may find that some people hold the opinion that human's behavior is limited by forces, while others have an opposite attitude that we can determine our own making. As far as I am concerned, I agree with the latter opinion that I believe people have the ability to make the decision to their behaviors. My view will explore by the following discussion.
Indeed, in now world, people have many regulations to limit our making. For example, when we drive cars, we have to follow the driving rules; otherwise, we might be stopped to use cars if we do not follow it. Alternatively, when we work on any company, every company always has their own rule to force the employees to do the right things which the company wants them to do. Therefore, every behavior seems to really be restricted by many and many forces.
On the other hand, the mode of people thinking and making come from the society which it does not say that we all accept that and will not change. In fact, we are interacting with society and mutual shaping. People will follow the thinkings or laws which they admire and then do some fine-tuned to their behavior or making. At the same time, they are also influencing their environment. In this process, people's mind obviously not control by forces and have the competent to select which they want to adapt.
The globalization of culture around the world let people much easier to accept the different thinking and behavior than before and with the advancing, we increase the freedom and autonomy in choosing thoughts and behaviors. For instance, we are easy to change living places in the recent 30 years. People have the right to select the environment, culture, regulations, and country, etc. Consequently, we are not likely limited by forces but, actually, the forces are original from our mind. We just like embodying our thoughts into forces so that we have the rule to follow in different situations.
In conclusion, despite the fact that we seem that people are largely determined by forces, there are still many factors we never consider discreetly. Thus, we cannot presumptuously believe the statement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 172, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
... that some people hold the opinion that humans behavior is limited by forces, while ot...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, if, may, really, so, still, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1869.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 382.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89267015707 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62996779959 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539267015707 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.027007863 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.45 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05 5.21951772744 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253113866253 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0769998811232 0.0831039109588 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613167434721 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149402903254 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490066341122 0.0667264976115 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.