"No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and
experience to that field of study
According to the speaker, outsiders bring about the advancements in any field of study because they bring about their knowledge and experience to that field of study. I agree in so far as the knowledge and experiences are pertinent to the field of study. In some cases, however, it could be equally detrimental to the field if basic nature of outsider's knowledge and experience does not coincides with the intended field ; otherwise the study will go astray.
The outsiders bring knowledge and experience that will be kind of new to the insiders. They bring new perspective of screening possibilities and the result. That might be helpful for many cases. For example, artists can suggest civil engineers some insight about making sturdy building with aesthetic point of view. Engineers can find calculate stress and strain but cannot figure out the aesthetic value as artist does. So, outsiders sometimes help to advancement of the study.
However, irrelevant experiences and knowledge and can have very detrimental effect on any related field of study. For example, if an artist is assigned to figure out how black hole may look like, he might use different linguistic insinuates that may exacerbate the problem even more. So, when we thinking about importing outsiders knowledge, how germane is the knowledge we are importing, this should be given more emphasis.
Secondly, relevant outsiders experience can give very insightful solution to the existing problem. For example, if a teacher consults with a psychologist about how to attract student more towards his lecture, that might certainly helps to meet learning objectives of the institute. That is why, proper relevance have to be find out before using them.
Additionally, when we impart new knowledge to one field of study from another one, morale will get automatically high. Personals are now tried to think globally. For example, if we are planning an expansion project, one should consider environmental impact, impact on local residential etc. This will help to formulate more general solution of the problem, where everybody can reconcile.
Finally, it seems beneficial to import knowledge form another field of study as far as the experience and knowledge is germane to the field of study, otherwise we might get off the track from the main motto.
In the final analysis, importing outsiders knowledge and experience to the field of study is like a two edged sword. It might have many beneficial effects if it is germane and helping to make more global solution. Otherwise, irrelevant ones can deter the flow of study work to its summery.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 388, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'coincide'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: coincide
...iders knowledge and experience does not coincides with the intended field ; otherwise the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 388, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'coincide'
Suggestion: coincide
...iders knowledge and experience does not coincides with the intended field ; otherwise the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ere everybody can reconcile. Finally, it seems beneficial to import knowledge ...
^^^
Line 10, column 52, Rule ID: FROM_FORM[4]
Message: Did you mean 'from'?
Suggestion: from
...it seems beneficial to import knowledge form another field of study as far as the ex...
^^^^
Line 11, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the flow of study work to its summery.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, for example, kind of, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2198.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 423.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19621749409 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77905057664 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503546099291 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 697.5 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.9452079768 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5652173913 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3913043478 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.13043478261 5.21951772744 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.83258426966 248% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31581867204 0.243740707755 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0956232745006 0.0831039109588 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104117451012 0.0758088955206 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171045355379 0.150359130593 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112206206152 0.0667264976115 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.