No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study
Advancement in each and every field of study helps in the overall development of the society. For this, its essential for each field to remain open to the contributions by outsiders. Such engagements bring a new perspective that can help in solving deadlocks.
For instance, when an expert approaches a problem, he/she fails to think beyond the innate principles relevant to the field. On the other hand, when a similar problem is appraoched by a layman to the field, he/she being unaware of those principles try to think in logical terms. They also bring in their knowledge and experience that allows to think for out of box ideas.
On a similar note, there is also an increasing trend of inter-disciplinary fields. Since all the phenomenas surrounding us cannot be isolated or categorized into a single field, it is only fair to study them from an overall view. Such a combined knowledge unspecific to a single area will allow for significant advancements in all the fields.
To sum up, a fresh mind towards a situation definitely allows for significant advancement in the field of study. Hence, it essential to incorporate the knowledge and experience of outsiders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 216, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...aoched by a layman to the field, he/she being unaware of those principles try to thin...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 343, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'thinking'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: thinking
...ir knowledge and experience that allows to think for out of box ideas. ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...llows to think for out of box ideas. On a similar note, there is also an incr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...icant advancements in all the fields. To sum up, a fresh mind towards a situat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, for instance, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 19.5258426966 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 58.6224719101 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 981.0 2235.4752809 44% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 195.0 442.535393258 44% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03076923077 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 4.55969084622 82% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07839281137 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 215.323595506 52% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579487179487 0.4932671777 117% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 704.065955056 43% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.5840859627 60.3974514979 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.1818181818 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7272727273 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.18181818182 5.21951772744 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306050957401 0.243740707755 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108264272936 0.0831039109588 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625483664888 0.0758088955206 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176251175306 0.150359130593 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363109066558 0.0667264976115 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 100.480337079 44% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.