In order for any work of art for example a novel a firm a poem a song to have merit it must be understandable to most people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you

Essay topics:

In order for any work of art- for example, a novel, a firm, a poem, a song- to have merit, it must be understandable to most people. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

People are attracted to what they comprehend, what gives them meaning and add a sense of relief or purpose to them. A novel, poem, or song that people can't relate to has the tendency of not being famous or creating the effect it is supposed to create. In other words, the popularity of songs, novels, poems are dependent on how understood it is, how relatable it is and if it has the capacity to give relief or stimulate people's interest. The prompt recommends that the work of art must be grasped by people in order to have merit or be popular. In my opinion, I mostly agree with the suggestion and argue that the work of art need not be arcane, rather understood by people to fly or add merit for three reasons.

To begin, it is true that everything need not be understood for it to be famous,or create the intended impact or capture the attention of all. For instance, most of African songs, to be specific, hi-pop songs are usually not understood by people outside of those African countries, but they still vibe to those songs, majorly because of the beat and how danceable the song is. Nigerian songs have gone viral to the extent that it is played in almost all clubs in other countries that are outside Africa, these songs most times are not comprehensible enough as they might be sang in the local dialects of such the country in question, but these people sing it, they dance to it. It is even realised that these songs or the singers usually win grammy awards, rank the top list of songs in other countries outside Africa. This shows how songs do not have to be understood to gain traction.

However, work of art is not restricted to songs alone, it can be said that songs can become famous without people understanding the lyrics of the songs. But what of poem, what of novel, and other work of art, do you think they would have the merit if they were not being comprehended? Obviously not, people need to understand what they are reading or listening to, they need to relate with it, as this is what make people attracted to those work of arts. For example, if a writer writes a book that is not accessible to all and needs to be explained by other for people to understand it, such book would not felt, or would not capture or draw the attention of men or women. Most novels that have won the Literature Nobel Awards are novels that people have read and loved, people have given them approbation or commendation for their good work of art because they can relate, interact and engage with it. Work of art must not be done in isolation without putting into cognisance its target audience. In other words, the target audience need to be considered before indulging in any art of work.

Further, releasing work of arts that are not comprehensible or lacks the words or language that the majority of people can interact with would not have the opportunity to send across the intended message it tends to pass across to people. This is so because it lacks the capacity to be relatable or understood as it is written or done in ways not known by the target audience. Impact is felt when a work of art is done in ways that the people can access without having to have others to serve as the third wheel in explaining it. This phenomenon (principle) cuts across other aspects of life. If for instance, a policy issued by a government is not understood by its citizens, abuse is inevitable, and the goal of such policy might not be achieved.

Of course, people would always say that work of art doesn't compulsorily have to be understood for it to be prevalent, majorly belabouring on songs. However, they might tend to forget that work of art is not limited to that alone. It cut across a variety of things, and if not understood, or done in ways that would attract its target audience, it won't create the impact it is supposed to create and be of merit let alone become famous.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 152, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...hem. A novel, poem, or song that people cant relate to has the tendency of not being...
^^^^
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'have'.
Suggestion: have
...oem, or song that people cant relate to has the tendency of not being famous or cre...
^^^
Line 3, column 80, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , or
...ed not be understood for it to be famous,or create the intended impact or capture t...
^^^
Line 9, column 53, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...eople would always say that work of art doesnt compulsorily have to be understood for ...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, still, third, for example, for instance, of course, in my opinion, in other words, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 46.0 19.5258426966 236% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 33.0 14.8657303371 222% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 70.0 33.0505617978 212% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 106.0 58.6224719101 181% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3187.0 2235.4752809 143% => OK
No of words: 707.0 442.535393258 160% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50777934936 5.05705443957 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.15649799773 4.55969084622 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45081577488 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 277.0 215.323595506 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.391796322489 0.4932671777 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1000.8 704.065955056 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 10.0 1.77640449438 563% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.5112649835 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.48 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.28 23.4991977007 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.21951772744 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301291768943 0.243740707755 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968145150263 0.0831039109588 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616088047086 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182356686024 0.150359130593 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642349292811 0.0667264976115 96% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 48.8420337079 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 12.1743820225 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 12.1639044944 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 152, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...hem. A novel, poem, or song that people cant relate to has the tendency of not being...
^^^^
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'have'.
Suggestion: have
...oem, or song that people cant relate to has the tendency of not being famous or cre...
^^^
Line 3, column 80, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , or
...ed not be understood for it to be famous,or create the intended impact or capture t...
^^^
Line 9, column 53, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...eople would always say that work of art doesnt compulsorily have to be understood for ...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, still, third, for example, for instance, of course, in my opinion, in other words, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 46.0 19.5258426966 236% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 33.0 14.8657303371 222% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 70.0 33.0505617978 212% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 106.0 58.6224719101 181% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3187.0 2235.4752809 143% => OK
No of words: 707.0 442.535393258 160% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50777934936 5.05705443957 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.15649799773 4.55969084622 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45081577488 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 277.0 215.323595506 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.391796322489 0.4932671777 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1000.8 704.065955056 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 10.0 1.77640449438 563% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.5112649835 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.48 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.28 23.4991977007 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.21951772744 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301291768943 0.243740707755 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968145150263 0.0831039109588 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616088047086 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182356686024 0.150359130593 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642349292811 0.0667264976115 96% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 48.8420337079 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 12.1743820225 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 12.1639044944 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.