In order to become well-rounded individuals, all college students should be required to take courses in which they read poetry, novels, mythology, and other types of imaginative literature
Education is a process of teaching and learning which seeks to improve knowledge and skills. In other words, education can be called a step towards progress and development since it aims at making the society knowledgeable and skilled. In the process, education involves changing some of the long held ideas and beliefs. The author claims that students should be encouraged to take multiple different courses in order to make them well rounded individuals. There is a merit in making this suggestion as this fosters and enables students to acquire skills outside their niche area however, it should not be a mandatory requirement.
Learning is a constant and never ending process. As a student every individual must strive to learn as many different things as possible. Steve Jobs had famously said, ”It is not possible to connect the dots of the future. The dots can only be connected by looking at the past”. This means that an individual cannot predict if the skills acquired are useful or not unless and until the student waits patiently for a few years. Therefore, every individual must strive to learn new things irrespective of their area of study. It is the act of learning that is important not the value obtained from the course, as every new course contributes in some way or the other to the individual’s personality.
Moreover, by promoting to participate in various courses apart from the standard curriculum the university encourages student to have multiple different hobbies and passions and hence makes their life multi dimensional. There is a saying that “ All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy”. This is true to a great extent. By taking different courses out of the standard curricula enables the student to interact with individuals having different interests and makes the student versatile in nature. This not only helps in increasing the productivity of the student but also helps them to foster multiple hobbies which prevents their life from getting monotonous.
However, even though it is necessary to have different hobbies and focus on being a well rounded individual, the author has gone too far claiming that every student must be forced to take variety of different courses. The choice of whether to select a course out of their field of study should be left to student. Sometimes an individual prefers to dedicate 100% focus to their chosen field of study in order to gain an expertise in that field. Even this approach is completely understandable as every student has to have their own saying in choosing their hobbies.
Finally, I would like to conclude saying that every university should promote students to take a variety of courses it should not be made mandatory on the student to choose such courses. Every student has the right to choose their own courses as these courses serve only the primary purpose of making the life of student multi dimensional.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 281, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...he process, education involves changing some of the long held ideas and beliefs. The author...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 103, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...very individual must strive to learn as many different things as possible. Steve Jobs had famo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 426, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ula enables the student to interact with individuals having different interests a...
^^
Line 4, column 385, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to field'
Suggestion: to field
... to dedicate 100% focus to their chosen field of study in order to gain an expertise ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, hence, however, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, well, apart from, as to, of course, in other words, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2447.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 486.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03497942387 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69525374022 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73782346378 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475308641975 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 765.0 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1547561203 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.391304348 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1304347826 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.08695652174 5.21951772744 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207832205654 0.243740707755 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631336933588 0.0831039109588 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710073277289 0.0758088955206 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13153962014 0.150359130593 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0537178612212 0.0667264976115 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.