In order to help small businesses thrive, government should play a minimal role in private business matters.
The issues states that intervention of government should be abated for small businesses to proliferate. The intervention in the private matters could be possible by forming stricter rules and regulations. There is a need for a profound analysis of the statement for a better conclusion to avoid hasty decisions.
Small businesses involve lesser resources and hence lesser production. Their primary motivation is always to get the best out of the available. But sometimes government's stricter rules and regulations might hinder them from achieving better performance. For instance, according to governments' labor laws, its difficult for any business to terminate a worker from their organisation. It is important to protect the labourers of an organisation but also inefficient labourers are a trouble to the blooming small businesses. Hence it would be ideal if the organisation is allowed to take the decision, instead of carrying the dead weight which reduces the performance
On the other hand, with minimal role of the government comes no intervention in terms of laws to protect the customer, leading to anarchy. For example, if there are no uniform trademarks or quality checks proposed by the government for the pulses, there's a higher possibility for adulteration which aids them in reducing the production cost. However it is an esoteric fact that adulteration involves addition of harmful chemicals which leaves the customers or nations human resources in danger. In addition, the approbation by national trademarks increases the confidence of the customers helping the small business to flourish.
To what extent is it feasible for government to intervene in private business matters of small businesses? In some sense it is crucial for govt to give some power to the organisation to make decisions. However the givernment should make sure that it is protecting every citizen's interest. Ranging from the small businessman to labours and customers, it is the duty of the government to protect them from injustice. In conclusion, government should propose a set of rules giving the leniency for the organisation to make certain edits as and when the situation demands would be ideal.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'state'.
Suggestion: state
The issues states that intervention of government should ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 522, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ouble to the blooming small businesses. Hence it would be ideal if the organisation i...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 205, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... no uniform trademarks or quality checks proposed by the government for the pulse...
^^
Line 4, column 250, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...posed by the government for the pulses, theres a higher possibility for adulteration w...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 344, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...s them in reducing the production cost. However it is an esoteric fact that adulteratio...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 203, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... to the organisation to make decisions. However the givernment should make sure that it...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 29.0 12.9106741573 225% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1855.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 345.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3768115942 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08538437206 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524637681159 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1220806309 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.117647059 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2941176471 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.29411764706 5.21951772744 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266334142882 0.243740707755 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0906769191957 0.0831039109588 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103501819956 0.0758088955206 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165260649923 0.150359130593 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362287337417 0.0667264976115 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.