Originality does not mean thinking something that was never thought before; it means putting old ideas together in new ways.
What is originality? An answer to this question can have multiple forms like the source of information, the authenticity of information, preciseness and accuracy of information etc… So it’s difficult to define the term Originality in terms of definition. While some people feel that it can be defined as something that was never thought before, most are of the opinion that it is simply putting old ideas in a new ways. I agree with the author that Originality is not an innovation of information rather it is the ways by which new information is generated which can be useful in research and development.
The chief reason for my view is that the information is recycled in its own ways. Originality is valued at how much authentic the information is. For example, traditionally there was an offline approach to recharge your phones but with the new technology it is possible to achieve the same task by sitting at home at the finger of your tip. Additionally a concept originated of giving “Voucher/ Coupons” for recharges. This idea was originally achieved by Kunal Shah, Founder of Freecharge.
Finally it can be viewed as the same problems is solved with much easiness by just implementing in new ways.
The second reason for my view is that with the help of technology and science many new innovations and discoverability is achieved in past 10 years. With technology the old ideas are amalgamate and then worked on to produces new results i.e., Originality. Let’s look at the example of Amazon Drone delivery or Uber’s driverless car. Both the examples are the result of innovations from old ideas. Therefore, the result is a process of cumulation and formation of old thoughts/issues put into a new ways.
Therefore, it cannot be said that originality is limited only as something which was never thought of rather a solution to an issue achieved by implementing in new ways. Not only the issues but also theory where old information is kept as a reference for the new innovations leading to originality.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 420, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'way'?
Suggestion: way
...it is simply putting old ideas in a new ways. I agree with the author that Originali...
^^^^
Line 3, column 342, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Additionally,
...ting at home at the finger of your tip. Additionally a concept originated of giving 'Vo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
... by Kunal Shah, Founder of Freecharge. Finally it can be viewed as the same problems i...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 184, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'amalgamated'.
Suggestion: amalgamated
...ears. With technology the old ideas are amalgamate and then worked on to produces new resu...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 509, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'way'?
Suggestion: way
...n of old thoughts/issues put into a new ways. Therefore, it cannot be said that o...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, look, second, so, then, therefore, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1713.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 341.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02346041056 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13326057526 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 215.323595506 81% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513196480938 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5512793433 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.764705882 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0588235294 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52941176471 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266734590122 0.243740707755 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0945877608165 0.0831039109588 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0905009358115 0.0758088955206 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150535662348 0.150359130593 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553867387623 0.0667264976115 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.8971910112 134% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.