Originality does not mean thinking something that was never thought before; it means putting old ideas together in new ways.
innovation is a major part in the contemporary world, people are depended on the novel ideas. Also, the each technology we see around is the diligent effort by some eminent people to make the public's life easier. Each product we see around is an evolution of an earlier model which have benefited us. So, putting old ideas together in new ways is the best way to define originality rather than bringing in novelty everytime. I support this statement totally. To get some more clarity, the subsequent paragraphs discusses some examples regarding the same.
Firstly, the life of a human would not have been easier, if the products we see around did not evolve and were stagnant in their development. humans would have lead a tedious life without the people who expedite the process of technological development in the world right now. The evolution of mobile communication is a phenomenal example to explain this situation. The communication to several places have been done through a rudimentary method of passing signals through metal wires. Each time the innovators found some idea related to the same which is not that new, but enhances the existing technology. Such developments have lead to the discovery of some affordable units of communication, made easier to communicate with everyone. Later, the era of portable phones have made communication easier. Finally, the cell phones available in the market is as efficient as the personal computer at our home. The embellishments added to each point of development is crucial but not novel or an idea never thought of before. but, the end product was always treated as original and innovative by the public. therefore, the originality is not novelty, but putting the old concepts in new ways.
Secondly, the acceptance of public is another deciding factor whether the new product is original or not. The innovation done in any field will not be fresh and new technology in the market. this can be easily explained by the evolution of watches from the natural clock by some earlier apparatus till the smart watches, the trendsetting product in the market. Actually, the product we see is just a impeccable integration of a touch-screen phone and a watch strap with new cool features. The same function which we observe in the mobile can be easily navigated through the "smart" watches. this clearly shows that the public accepts and considers it as an original product, whether it be a novel or an existing idea. They are only concentrating on the purpose and the features that make their life cozy. therefore, it perfectly exemplifies the originality is not novelty, but integration and implementation of the old ideas into one unit.
In a nutshell, the idea is explicable in several other inventions and discoveries, we can see around and observed. it does not end with mobile or watches but plethora of things.The above idea gives only a short and comprehensive idea to know this topic.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Innovation
innovation is a major part in the contemporary wor...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'publics'' or 'public's'?
Suggestion: publics'; public's
...fort by some eminent people to make the publics life easier. Each product we see around...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... some examples regarding the same. Firstly, the life of a human would not h...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 143, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Humans
...and were stagnant in their development. humans would have lead a tedious life without ...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1023, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...vel or an idea never thought of before. but, the end product was always treated as ...
^^^
Line 9, column 1105, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
... original and innovative by the public. therefore, the originality is not novelty, but pu...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ting the old concepts in new ways. Secondly, the acceptance of public is an...
^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 192, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...fresh and new technology in the market. this can be easily explained by the evolutio...
^^^^
Line 17, column 399, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...t. Actually, the product we see is just a impeccable integration of a touch-scree...
^
Line 17, column 602, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... through the 'smart' watches. this clearly shows that the public accepts a...
^^^^
Line 17, column 816, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...the features that make their life cozy. therefore, it perfectly exemplifies the originali...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 116, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...veries, we can see around and observed. it does not end with mobile or watches but...
^^
Line 21, column 178, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...obile or watches but plethora of things.The above idea gives only a short and compr...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2488.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 490.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07755102041 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70488508055 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93392172863 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504081632653 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 809.1 704.065955056 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 17.0 4.99550561798 340% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.2179638897 60.3974514979 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.1481481481 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1481481481 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.21951772744 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 7.80617977528 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163908046898 0.243740707755 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.045930262715 0.0831039109588 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069663617218 0.0758088955206 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0981454773149 0.150359130593 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0187865313423 0.0667264976115 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 100.480337079 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.