“Our declining environment may bring the people of the world together as no politician, philosopher,
or war ever could. Environmental problems are global in scope and respect no nation’s boundaries.
Therefore, people are faced with the choice of unity and cooperation on the one hand or disunity and
a common tragedy on the other.”
While environment issues are common factors across the globe, there are many very perspectives on the necessity and prioritization of addressing these issues. Additionally, in the argument, the key roles other events and people have had in uniting the role have been glossed over. Because of the significant role of many events and public figures, the factions present within the topic of environmental issues, and the economic motives of corporations, the declining environment may not be the most uniting global force we have encountered yet.
Unfortunately, there are many divisions on the necessity of action on various environmental issues. For example, the hotly debated issue of global warming has caused the formation of strong factions across the globe. Many individuals believe that global warming is occurring due to human activities and should be counteracted. However, others believe that global warming is occurring at a natural rate, unaffected by human activity, and thus, should not be counteracted. Still other groups deny that global warming is occurring. In American politics, this is a hotly debated issue that influences voting patterns and has been taken up as significant issues by the major political parties. This is just one example of how polarized and divided environmental issues are in today’s society. Because of these differing opinions on environmental issues, the declining environment will not be the most uniting global event thus far.
While environmental issues may not be globally uniting due to the strong divisions within the issues, many other events and public figures have created strong global unions. Events in history such as the tearing down of the Berlin Wall, marking the end of an era of oppression and division, had a globally uniting effect. Additionally, important leaders like Nelson Mandela, Martin Luther King Jr., and Ghandi, had philosophies on peaceful resistance of racism and oppression that affected and united the world in combatting racism, oppression, and other issues peacefully. Events or leaders such as these had strongly uniting effects across the world that may outweigh the global union created by environmental issues.
Lastly, the argument ignores the economic factors behind the issue. Manufacturing and energy generation are major sources of pollution and contamination of the environment. However, because these industries generate incomes and help the rest of the world operate, there are limits to the restrictions governments will put on these industries or the industries will impose on themselves. These economic motives are significant factors that may prevent global cooperation on environmental issues.
Therefore, due to the division created over environmental issues, the significant uniting effect other events or leaders have had globally, and the economic motives of corporations, the declining environment across the world will likely not bring the world to a previously unseen level of cooperation and unity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 472, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Still,
..., and thus, should not be counteracted. Still other groups deny that global warming i...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, lastly, may, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2562.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 458.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59388646288 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99450307785 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 215.323595506 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.447598253275 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 821.7 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.929335989 60.3974514979 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.1 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128305944809 0.243740707755 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0442549752646 0.0831039109588 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0332929584384 0.0758088955206 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0805794264901 0.150359130593 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0189302050197 0.0667264976115 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 48.8420337079 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.1639044944 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 100.480337079 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.8971910112 134% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.