As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
It is true that today people are relying more and more on technology to solve any problem but this does not mean that their thinking ability is declining. It is the human only who has invented these technologies. As, people are using technology, they might be becoming lazy but surely not stupid. However, there ia a lot of difference between becoming lazy and stupid. Therefore, person's thinking ability is not deteriorating because of growing technology.
Primarily, I would like to say that people are using technology to make their life easier. Our every day starts with a technology and ends with it too. Whether it may be a coffee wending machine, may be a hair dryer or a car. These technologies are helping people in order to focus on other more important tasks. For instance, humans have developed vehicles like bus, car etc. Using them to go to office or school makes it easier than going to the workplace by bullock cart or by foot. We save our energy in these tasks so that it can be utilised in other more fruitful things. Students can focus better on their studies if they have not to travel on foot to their school. Technology saves time as well as energy which can be efficiently utilised in other more important issues.
Had humans not developed a smart phone. We would not have been able to connect to the person's worldwide. Today we are able to talk to the person sitting thousands of miles away. This is the gift of technology only. Smart phones and computers are being used all over the world. In addition to this, children in poorer countries, where education system is not very good, are using internet to learn. So, we can say that technology has not affected the person's thinking ability, rather, it has made people smarter, intellectual and more productive.
As it is well said that every coin has two faces, there are some disadvantages of technologies also. Here, I would like to mention that technology has also negatively affected the lives of the people. For example, invention of the calculator (whose focus was to do complex calculations) facilitated humans to calculate tedious and complex things in just a blink of eye. But, people use it for much easier calculations which can be done mentally. Invention of robots, is making the human's life easier but it is surely affecting the person's ability to do simple chores of day to day life. Inculcating more and more technology in our daily lives is surely making the humans lazy.
Finally, we can say that using technology is improving the lives of the people and does not deteriorate the human's thinking ability. It is good to invent new things and implement it in day to day life to make life easier. Technology might be affecting the person's physical ability but it is surely improving a person's thinking ability.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 96, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
... are some disadvantages of technologies also. Here, I would like to mention that tec...
^^^^
Line 7, column 480, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...lly. Invention of robots, is making the humans life easier but it is surely affecting...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 508, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... making the humans life easier but it is surely affecting the persons ability to ...
^^
Line 7, column 531, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... easier but it is surely affecting the persons ability to do simple chores of day to d...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 309, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a person' or simply 'persons'?
Suggestion: a person; persons
...ical ability but it is surely improving a persons thinking ability.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2323.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 486.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77983539095 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69525374022 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60415557839 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.4670781893 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 761.4 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.9141905045 60.3974514979 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.4333333333 118.986275619 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26666666667 5.21951772744 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 10.2758426966 195% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215302369968 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591448647384 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591262681516 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131138445192 0.150359130593 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423872616325 0.0667264976115 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 14.1392134831 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.