As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Humans have gone from the use of bullock carts to landing on the moon in less than a hundred years. Science and technology are the two faces of the same coin, and this is what has enabled us to achieve such great things. Too much of any good thing is said to be harmful. Does this mean relying a lot on technology to solve our problems diminish our abilities to think for ourselves? Not at all. In fact, it enhances our progress. Technology is used in every field that can be thought of. It is applied in medicine, travel, computation, banking, teaching, learning, entertainment, and so on.
Usage of technology in banking has made the lives of consumers very easy. This has also effectively reduced the effort required to complete simple, mundane tasks which used to take up a lot of the precious time of bankers. Once a well designed system is set up appropriately, all transactions can be handled by it and bankers are required only for monitoring these, and to fix small errors if they occur. This has not hampered the knowledge or thinking of any banker. These are just tools for the bankers so that they can focus on more important things, rather than work on these mundane things which would take up a lot of their time and be exhausted.
Consider the case of using technology in medicine. With the advent of technology, diagnoses of various diseases has become very easy thanks to various scans like ultrasound or CT scan. Doctors can monitor pregnant women and ensure the healthy status of the children. One of the biggest problems that exists even now in some places is mismatch in understanding by the pharmacist, the prescription the doctor gives. By using technology instead of giving handwritten prescriptions, this is eliminated. Drug names and dosages are not misread or confused anymore. A slight change in a decimal point, say 5 mL instead of 0.5 mL of certain medicine can be lethal in a few cases. Technology here is solving the problems only of the steps taken by the doctor for a patient, whereas the diagnosis is still presented by the doctor themselves. The doctor can now focus more on diagnosing the patient and take their time to relax appropriately instead of worrying about the paperwork and other things which can be automated by technology.
There are cases where using too much technology reduces the ability of humans to think for themselves. For instance, providing school students with calculators to perform basic math impedes their quick problem solving skills. They might end up finding basic calculations which everyone should be able to do quickly, difficult. Using technology for entertainment might create an addiction among young children. These problems are solvable. They should be addressed by parents and ensure technology is provided in a limited manner so that the children can acquire basic skills and allow the development of brain till they are adults.
Thus, the benefits of using technology far outweighs the cons. There are cases where human thinking can deteriorate because of usage of technology, but these can be solved appropriately. Technology has been a stepping stone towards success. It has been one of the most important tools developed by mankind for progress, and is a powerful one.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 510, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a limited manner" with adverb for "limited"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...rents and ensure technology is provided in a limited manner so that the children can acquire basic ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, thus, well, whereas, for instance, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2714.0 2235.4752809 121% => OK
No of words: 549.0 442.535393258 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94353369763 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84053189512 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76216520816 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 293.0 215.323595506 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533697632058 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 843.3 704.065955056 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 32.0 20.2370786517 158% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.1734232844 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.8125 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.15625 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.125 5.21951772744 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 10.2758426966 195% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180891624719 0.243740707755 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0439794107064 0.0831039109588 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536748185389 0.0758088955206 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107412495673 0.150359130593 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268787356254 0.0667264976115 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 139.0 100.480337079 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.