As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
As the rapid development of the technology, there are more and more morden facilities that equip human's daily life and assist us to solve problems. There is no denying that people will depend on those high-tech equipment, however, the capacity of humans to think for themselves may not be undermined.
Based on the fact that apps invaded humans life, such as the Uber, Google maps, and various kinds of searching engines. There is a tendency that people are more likely to rely on the mobile notice rather than using their brain to remember stuffs; they tend to use the apps to lead the road rather than establishing a map in their mind; they are more willing to look through information through insgram rather than read some books or paper magazines. Those kind of new technology change the way of managing business or personal stuff, and subvert people's life to a large extent, which liberate people's mind of remembering too much detailed information and give more time to big-pictured plan.
Some people may claim that with the help of those technology, people's brain cannot get enough training and as a complex organ, our brain need to get enough exercise to keep fit, therefore, the deterioration of our brain is caused by shock of the social development and is troublesome to reserve.
However, the equipment is designed for increasing our living standard, and we need to understand the meaning of its existance and try to figure out a scientific way to combine it with our lives. For example, as for the mobile, if we search any questions we come up with on the Google, we may to some extent lose our ability to think and forget some knowledge if not use it regularly. By contrast, if we try to figure out a question with ourselves with the information offered in the internet, we may obtain an even better answer and at the same time exercise our capacity to deal with difficulities. As a result, the way of using new technology is of great importance, and if use it in a wise way, we can even raise our ability of analyzing, thinking and figuring out the answer to questions.
The technology development and serve for our lives is a presedented future, howver, how to utilize it is our choice, which is calling for the need of extensive understanding of life's meaning and the high awareness of being healthy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 451, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'Those kinds'?
Suggestion: This kind; Those kinds
...han read some books or paper magazines. Those kind of new technology change the way of man...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 45, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this technology' or 'those technologies'?
Suggestion: this technology; those technologies
... people may claim that with the help of those technology, peoples brain cannot get enough traini...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 684, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a wise way" with adverb for "wise"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...y is of great importance, and if use it in a wise way, we can even raise our ability of analy...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, may, so, therefore, as for, for example, kind of, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1925.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 405.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75308641975 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69007104805 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508641975309 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 618.3 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 23.0359550562 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.9139879362 60.3974514979 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 175.0 118.986275619 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.8181818182 23.4991977007 157% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.09090909091 5.21951772744 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252193069858 0.243740707755 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0961507683888 0.0831039109588 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765066049853 0.0758088955206 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143112853387 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11893337283 0.0667264976115 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 14.1392134831 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.4 48.8420337079 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 12.1743820225 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 11.2143820225 146% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.