Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people whom they serve.
Nowadays, there is a common consensus in the society that government officials should be on the grond of their judgement instead of implement as the willingness of the people. However, as a mature social structure, though in some cases the officials are able to make decisions inside, the spirit and mind of most people in the nation are necessary to take into consideration.
Under some urgent conditions, the officials should be capable to make quick and comprehensive decisions which protect the benefits of most people. It is impossible that all kinds of events are suitable and scientific to publishize, in order to carry out the will of the people the officials served. For instance, when deciding how to punish the criminals, if the government provide some channels for the residents to offer their opinions, the final justification might be in chaoes, which could be a challenge for the authorition of law. Another example for that is the codification of laws, there should be professional people do specific things, and there is no common standard to calculate the level of the IQ for all the residents, hence there should be officals who glean the information that reflects the spirits them and codify the law. According, the power and capacity of making decisions is essential for the morden society.
However, there is undenying that the opinions from the people the grovernment managers are of great significance. What if the officials are exploiting their prower and chasing for their own profits? What if their decisions harm the benefit from most people? What if they neglect the further development of the whole country? Only do the voice from the public can represent the willingness of the whole country. Dated back to hundreds of years ago, the old british ruined blame on the outmoded structure wich solely one person can make the decision, the King.
Furthermore, if the points from the public are not emphesised, there might be panic through the country and the society stability will be devastate. In America people like Martin Luther King stood up and called for freedon of the Black; In China, people like Deng Xiaoping woke up other center officials and Chinese economic began to improve. If the opinions from the public are not considered and respected for a government, there is no chance for the governemt to be strong and win the reputation from their people.
In conclusion, though there exist some impartial and extreme ideas among the public, the most appealing and supported ideas should be considered in the government's judgement. Not only can it assist to management of the country, but also it will bolster the passionate of people to trust and advocate the decisions, which will help to build a harmonious and dovish nation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 259, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ions harm the benefit from most people? What if they neglect the further development...
^^^^
Line 17, column 153, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...orted ideas should be considered in the governments judgement. Not only can it assist to ma...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, for instance, in conclusion, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2325.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 459.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06535947712 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62863751936 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73917817957 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496732026144 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 717.3 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.8753226703 60.3974514979 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.166666667 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.21951772744 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198165505077 0.243740707755 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663911357153 0.0831039109588 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540987445082 0.0758088955206 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113115053487 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0231357592881 0.0667264976115 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 100.480337079 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.